RFC 41

IMP-IMP Teletype Communication

πŸ“… published March 1970, from ietf

RFC 41: IMP/IMP Teletype Communication πŸ’–

Network Working Group πŸŽ€

  • Author: John Melvin, SRI/ARC πŸ‘‘
  • Request for Comments: 41 ✨
  • Date: 30 March 1970 🌸
  • Obsoletes / Updates: nothing listed here 🫢

okay so this one is a tiny but iconic little request from 1970 πŸ’… John Melvin was on the IMP teletype and kept running into the same annoying thing: he'd see a message from another site, but there was no time or date on it. πŸ™ˆ

And that totally matters, bestie! If the message is less than an hour old, a reply might be totally in order. If it's several hours old? Probably not. Without a timestamp you're just guessing πŸ’€ and it's giving chaos. It got worse because sites were now spread across every U.S. time zone and some of them didn't have a direct voice line to call and ask. πŸ“žβœ¨

So John's ask is simple and very gracious πŸ¦‹: everyone should tag their IMP-to-IMP teletype messages that don't get any response from the receiving IMP. πŸ’œ

He also dropped the practical bit πŸ“: the transmitting IMP site should use 24 hour time and include the time zone designation. No "3:00" that could be AM or PM, no vibes-based time zones. Clear, precise, periodt. 🧚


[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Larry Campbell 7/97 ]

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from