RFC 4048
RFC 1888 Is Obsolete
RFC 4048: RFC 1888 Is Obsolete π
Okay bestie, here's the header stuff first π
Request for Comments: 4048 Category: Informational Author: Brian E. Carpenter (IBM) Date: April 2005 Network Working Group
The title says it all: RFC 1888 is obsolete π This doc recommends reclassifying it as Historic, since almost all of it has no further value except one section, which is faulty. π₯
Status of This Memo
This memo gives information to the Internet community β¨ It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited π¦
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). π
Abstract
This doc recommends that RFC 1888, on Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Network Service Access Points (NSAPs) and IPv6, be reclassified as Historic π°οΈ Most of it has no further value, apart from one section, which is faulty π
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .................................................. 1
2. Recommendation to Reclassify RFC 1888 ......................... 2
3. Security Considerations ....................................... 2
4. IANA Considerations ........................................... 2
5. Acknowledgements .............................................. 2
6. Normative References .......................................... 3
Author's Address .................................................. 3
Full Copyright Statement .......................................... 4
1. Introduction πΈ
Okay so [RFC1888] came out as an Experimental RFC in 1996, back when IPv6 was super new π§ People really wanted to think about using OSI addressing with IPv6, so it was a big deal at the time. In Sections 3 through 5, it defines mappings of certain OSI Network Service Access Point (NSAP) addresses inside IPv6 addresses, plus how to carry arbitrary NSAP addresses as IPv6 destination options. But it also has some serious "health warnings" about how hard it is to route packets across the global Internet using those addresses π¨ As far as the IETF knows, these address mappings have never been seriously used, and IPv6 implementations don't support them. Also, OSI deployment isn't widespread enough that anything is likely to change that situation π
Also, Section 6 of [RFC1888] specifies a mapping of IPv6 addresses inside OSI NSAP addresses π This one got some buzz lately, for example to let IP addresses be expressed in an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) context. Unfortunately, Section 6 of [RFC1888] has two errors in how it uses the OSI Initial Domain Part (IDP) format π
- First, the text calls the Internet Code Point (ICP) a single octet, when it's actually a 16-bit field.
- Second, the text says "[t]he first three octets are an IDP in binary format". But [NSAP] says in section A.5.2.1 that "[t]he abstract syntax for the IDI is decimal digits", and it specifies a preferred binary encoding in section A.5.3 "using a semi-octet to represent the value of each decimal digit ... , yielding a value in the range 0000-1001".
2. Recommendation to Reclassify RFC 1888 π¦
Because one of the mappings is basically unused, and the other one's documentation has errors, this doc recommends that the IESG reclassify [RFC1888] as Historic π
It's assumed that anyone who wants to use a mapping of IPv6 addresses inside OSI NSAP addresses will correct, augment, and resubmit Section 6 of [RFC1888] as a separate document π
3. Security Considerations π
This recommendation has no known impact on the security of the Internet. Zero drama here π«Ά
4. IANA Considerations β¨
IANA has marked the IPv6 address prefix 0000 001, which is reserved for NSAP Allocation in [RFC3513], simply as Reserved.
IANA is holding the registry for "OSI NSAPA Internet Code Point" implied by Section 6 of [RFC1888] in abeyance until a replacement for that Section is approved for publication β³
5. Acknowledgements π
Scott Brim and Arun Pandey made useful comments on this document. Thank you, queens π
6. Normative References π
[RFC1888] Bound, J., Carpenter, B., Harrington, D., Houldsworth, J.,
and A. Lloyd, "OSI NSAPs and IPv6", RFC 1888, August 1996.
[RFC3513] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6
(IPv6) Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003.
[NSAP] International Organization for Standardization,
"Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection --
Network service definition", ISO/IEC 8348:2002, 2002.
Author's Address π·
Brian E. Carpenter
IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
Saeumerstrasse 4 / Postfach
8803 Rueschlikon
Switzerland
EMail: brc@zurich.ibm.com
Full Copyright Statement π
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property π
The IETF takes no position on the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to apply to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document, or on whether any license under such rights might or might not be available. It also doesn't claim to have made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Info on the procedures for rights in RFC documents is in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat, any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt to get a general license or permission for implementers or users to use such proprietary rights can be found in the IETF online IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please send that info to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. π¬
Acknowledgement π
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. π
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc4048 2005-04
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms