RFC 361
Deamon Processes on Host 106
RFC 361 π Bob's Daemon Update
okay bestie, the title block tea β: this is a Network Working Group doc by Bob Bressler from MIT-DMCG, with NIC number 10603, dated 5 July 1972 π . It doesn't list a category or status, and it doesn't obsolete or update any other RFC. β¨
In response to RFCs 347 and 348, which are ECHO and DISCARD, MIT-DMCG (Host 106) now has daemon processes that answer RFCs on sockets 7 and 9 π§. Literally so iconic. π
Bob also wanted to hear what people think about a few admin-type decisions π«Ά.
First, if the machine is too full to run another daemon process, the proposed connection gets refused. That means a CLS is sent back in response to the RFC on socket 7 or 9 π.
Second, if nothing happens for two consecutive minutes (no characters coming in on input, or output stuck waiting for allocation), the connection gets aborted π. Not me timing out on the vibes. β°
Then comes the question for the group chat: does anyone see a need or a use for a third service, a random character generator? π Lowkey, a lot of systems already have programs like "TTYTST" that you can reach over the standard login connection. But it would be totally doable to make a server connection (like ECHO) that only offers this one limited service π. Bob's pretty sure it'd be super useful for new NCPs and for gathering statistics π. Ngl, that's a strong case. π₯
This RFC was turned into machine-readable form for the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the direction of Alex McKenzie, in January 1997 π.
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc361 1972-07
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms