RFC 25

No High Link Numbers

πŸ“… published October 1969, from ietf

okay bestie, this is RFC 25 πŸŽ€, a memo from the Network Working Group. Steve Crocker at UCLA wrote it, and it's dated 30 October 1969 πŸ¦‹


okay so, there might be a reason to save one or more link numbers for instrumentation purposes 🧚, and 256 link numbers is way more than anyone actually needs πŸ’…. so we suggest that no link number over 63 be used. at UCLA, we're building our tables to take advantage of this limit πŸ”₯. we also note that 32 might be even more realistic 🌸, but 64 is certainly sufficient ✨ periodt πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from