RFC 218
Changing the IMP status reporting facility
RFC 218 π B. Cosell, BBN, 8 September 1971
okay bestie, this is a super short one but it's giving main character energy π It's Request for Comments #218 (NIC #7548), written by B. Cosell of BBN on 8 September 1971. It's in category B.1, and it doesn't update or obsolete anything, so it's a fresh little drop π¦
The IMP Status Reporting Glow-Up β¨
okay so BBN is changing how the IMP does its status reporting πΈ They're doing this to help expand their role as NCC, and it's happening within the next month. The best part? It should be totally transparent to the hosts π«Ά
The text status reports are getting removed π They've already been fully replaced by a binary version that goes straight to the NCC, so the text ones were just sitting there as excess baggage. Honestly, same energy as deleting old screenshots π
The status reports will still live with the statistics program on fake host 3 π But here's the lowkey clever part: they won't be affected by any of the PARAMETER CHANGE parameters anymore. That way the Hosts can't accidentally mess with how the NCC operates π Protecting the NCC is giving β¨
BC/jm π
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ] [ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc218 1971-09
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms