zfcp_dbf_rec_trig_lock(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

zfcp_dbf_rec_trig_lock β€” bestie, this is the one that traces a triggered recovery with the lock situation, and honestly it's giving "tiny function, big responsibility" ✨

(also hi, you're reading the zfcp_dbf_rec_trig_lock(9) page from the Kernel API Manual πŸŽ€)


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void zfcp_dbf_rec_trig_lock (char *tag , struct zfcp_adapter *adapter ,
struct zfcp_port *port , struct scsi_device *sdev , u8 want , u8 need );

no cap, that's the whole signature β€” six args, one void, zero drama πŸ¦‹


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

okay so here's who's who in the group chat:

  • tag β€” the identifier for the event 🏷️ like a little name badge so you know which trace you're looking at
  • adapter β€” the adapter on which the erp_action should run πŸ‘‘
  • port β€” the remote port that's involved in the erp_action 🌈
  • sdev β€” the scsi device involved in the erp_action πŸ’–
  • want β€” the wanted erp_action 🫢 (what we're hoping for)
  • need β€” the required erp_action πŸ”₯ (what we actually gotta have)

πŸ’€ DESCRIPTION πŸ’€

real talk, the important bit is this one line:

adapter->erp_lock must not be held. 🚨

like, do not be holding that lock, bestie. it's not the vibe. the function says so, I say so, periodt πŸ’…


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the kernel file lives at ./drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c and it's surrounded by absolute icons, fr fr:


ngl the whole squad is in ./drivers/s390/scsi, dated October 2026 🌸 so go read the rest of them too, iykyk πŸŽ€βœ¨

that's the page bestie, mwah πŸ’‹ β€” signed, your fav kernel-fluent girly πŸ«ΆπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from