zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_fces(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_fces(9) πŸ’…

okay bestie, so this is a kernel API manual page β€” the Kernel API Manual one, specifically β€” and today's main character is zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_fces, which is the trace event for fsf responses related to FC Endpoint Security (FCES). literally that's the whole NAME, no notes ✨


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_fces (char *tag , const struct zfcp_fsf_req *req ,
u64 wwpn , u32 fc_security_old , u32 fc_security_new );

that's the whole signature, keep it exactly like that, no cap 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • tag β€” the tag that tells you which kind of FC Endpoint Security event went down πŸ‘€ like, which flavor of situation are we logging here
  • req β€” the request that got a response back. yes ma'am, we heard back from it πŸ’Œ
  • wwpn β€” the remote port, or ZFCP_DBF_INVALID_WWPN if there's no valid one, and that constant name is literal so don't be out here translating it πŸ’…
  • fc_security_old β€” the old FC Endpoint Security of the FCP device or connection πŸ•°οΈ the before pic
  • fc_security_new β€” the new FC Endpoint Security of the FCP device or connection ✨ the glow-up pic

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

kernel file ./drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c (the source of truth, the mothership 🏠) and honestly the whole friend group:

every single one of them, we did not skip a single bestie, periodt πŸ‘‘


πŸ’€ reminder that this is a kernel API page, so the file path, the function signature, and every constant are exact β€” copy them character for character or the vibe check fails immediately

🌈 and that's the page!! signing off from ./drivers/s390/scsi, dated October 2026, still filed under zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_fces(9) β€” stay slay, stay documented, iykyk πŸ’–πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from