xe_vma_userptr_check_repin(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xe_vma_userptr_check_repin β€” like, the advisory repin check bestie πŸ’…

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, and it's all about xe_vma_userptr_check_repin β€” yes that's a whole mouthful, i know, but stay with me 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

xe_vma_userptr_check_repin β€” the advisory check for whether a repin is needed πŸ‘€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int xe_vma_userptr_check_repin (struct xe_userptr_vma *uvma );

literally just one function, one arg, int coming back at you πŸ’–


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • uvma β€” the userptr vma in question, that's the whole vibe ✨

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so what this does: it checks whether the userptr vma has been invalidated since the last successful repin. that's it. that's the check πŸ’…

the check is advisory only β€” meaning it's giving "hey bestie maybe look into this" and not "this is legally binding", y'know? 😭

the way that this matters: the function can be called without the vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock held. iconic, lowkey convenient. but 🚨 there is no guarantee that the vma userptr will remain valid after a lockless check. so typically the call needs to be followed by a proper check under the notifier_lock. no cap, that second check is not optional in practice, so don't skip it πŸ™ˆ


πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • 0 β€” userptr vma is valid, we love to see it πŸ‘‘
  • -EAGAIN β€” otherwise; repin recommended. yeah. it's giving "go repin" πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


and that's the page!! mwah πŸ’– this little gem lives in ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dated October 2026, and it's titled xe_vma_userptr_check_repin(9) β€” go forth and repin responsibly, bestie πŸ§šβœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from