wx_write_mbx_pf(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’Œ wx_write_mbx_pf(9) β€” the kernel API manual, but make it cute

okay so bestie, you're reading the manual page for wx_write_mbx_pf from the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? It's a little baddie with one job: it places a message in the mailbox πŸ“¬βœ¨ No cap, that's the whole NAME section. Short king behavior, and we respect it.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int wx_write_mbx_pf (struct wx *wx , u32 *msg , u16 size , u16 vf );

literally just the signature, exactly like that, spaces before the commas and all β€” do not come for me, I'm copying it character for character 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • wx β€” pointer to the HW structure. it's giving "here's the hardware, please handle her gently" πŸ’…
  • msg β€” The message buffer. this is the actual note you're dropping in the box πŸ’Œ
  • size β€” Length of buffer. gotta tell it how much of msg is real, bestie, no vibes-based guessing πŸ™ˆ
  • vf β€” the VF index. which virtual function we're talking to, iykyk πŸ‘‘

πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

it returns 0 on success, and -EINVAL/-EBUSY on failure. that's it, that's the whole mood β€” zero is the slay, the negatives are the "she's not available right now" 😭

ngl, -EBUSY is the universal "try again later, I'm booked and busy" and honestly? same.

🌸 SEE ALSO 🌸

first up, the source herself:

Kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_mbx.c

and then the whole friend group, all of them, in order (I'm not skipping a single one, that would be a crime):

the way there's both a _pf and a _vf version of almost everything… it's giving twins energy πŸ‘―β€β™€οΈπŸ’–


okay and finally, the cute little sign-off: this page came from ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun... (yes, it's literally truncated like that in the footer, I refuse to invent the rest 🫢) and it's dated October 2026. stay hydrated, write your mailbox messages responsibly, and remember β€” 0 on success, bestie. periodt. πŸ’…βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from