wx_check_for_ack_pf(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… wx_check_for_ack_pf(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual bestie ✨

okay so real talk, this page lives in the Kernel API Manual section 9, and it's all about wx_check_for_ack_pf. yes it's a mouthful, no you're not gonna say it out loud at a party πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

wx_check_for_ack_pf β€” checks to see if the VF has acked 🫢

like that's literally its whole job. it checks. for an ack. from the VF. iconic behavior honestly.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int wx_check_for_ack_pf (struct wx *wx , u16 vf );

that's the whole vibe check right there β€” returns an int, takes a struct wx * and a u16. she's compact, she's efficient, she's giving main character energy πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • wx β€” pointer to the HW structure. your hardware bestie, the one holding all the context πŸ’–
  • vf β€” the VF index. which VF are we even talking about? this number. this is the number πŸ”₯

🌈 RETURN 🌈

you get 0 if the VF has set the status bit β€” slay, it acked, we love to see it βœ…

or else you get -EBUSY β€” not me getting handed a -EBUSY, that's the "she's busy, try again later" of error codes 😭

ngl, -EBUSY here means the ack status bit was not set. it's not a "the world is ending" error, it's a "not yet bestie" error. still, check your return values fr fr.

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

the source lives in this kernel file, periodt:

./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_mbx.c

and here's the whole friend group, all of them, no cap β€” go read them too:


and that's the page!! 🧚 this little source path ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun... is dated October 2026 and honestly? she's serving. go check your mailbox acks, bestie πŸ’œπŸ“

mwah πŸ’‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from