wx_setup_all_tx_resources(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ wx_setup_all_tx_resources ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the Linux Kernel API Manual page for wx_setup_all_tx_resources β€” section 9, kernel API vibes only, no cap πŸ’…


🌸 NAME 🌸

wx_setup_all_tx_resources β€” the girl who allocates all the queues' Tx resources πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int wx_setup_all_tx_resources (struct wx *wx );

πŸ’œ ARGUMENTS πŸ’œ

  • wx β€” pointer to the private structure πŸ‘‘ (that's the whole vibe, it's just a pointer to the private struct)

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so listen, this is the important bit and I need you to hear me πŸ™ˆ

If this function returns with an error, then it's possible that one or more of the rings is populated (while the rest are not). literally a partial-slay situation. And it is the caller's duty to clean those orphaned rings β€” that's on you, bestie, not on this function. you adopted them, you clean them 🫢

It returns 0 on success, and a negative value on failure. periodt.

⚠️ lowkey the main character energy here is "returns error β†’ some rings are still full β†’ you gotta clean up." do not skip that part fr fr

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

Kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c β€” that's the source of truth, iykyk πŸ’–

and here's the whole friend group, like every single one of them, no one left out πŸ₯Ή:


🧚 tiny sign-off before you go: this page lives under ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun... and it's dated October 2026, and yes it's still called wx_setup_all_tx_resources(9) β€” slay, go allocate something πŸŒˆβ­πŸ’€
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from