wx_alloc_q_vector(9)

๐Ÿ“ฆ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

๐Ÿ’… wx_alloc_q_vector โ€” Allocate memory for a single interrupt vector ๐Ÿ’…

okay so real talk bestie, this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, section 9 of the manuals, and the star of the show is wx_alloc_q_vector(9). It's giving "one job, one vector, let's go" energy and honestly? Iconic. ๐ŸŽ€


โœจ NAME โœจ

wx_alloc_q_vector โ€” Allocate memory for a single interrupt vector ๐Ÿ’œ


๐ŸŒธ SYNOPSIS ๐ŸŒธ

int wx_alloc_q_vector (struct wx *wx , unsigned int v_count , unsigned
int v_idx , unsigned int txr_count , unsigned int txr_idx , unsigned int
rxr_count , unsigned int rxr_idx );

๐Ÿฆ‹ ARGUMENTS ๐Ÿฆ‹

Every single one of these babies, no skips, no cap:

  • wx โ€” the board private structure you're initializing ๐Ÿซถ
  • v_count โ€” the q_vectors allocated on wx, used for ring interleaving ๐Ÿ‘‘
  • v_idx โ€” the index of the vector in the wx struct โญ
  • txr_count โ€” total number of Tx rings to allocate ๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • txr_idx โ€” index of the first Tx ring to allocate ๐ŸŒˆ
  • rxr_count โ€” total number of Rx rings to allocate ๐Ÿ“
  • rxr_idx โ€” index of the first Rx ring to allocate ๐Ÿงš

๐Ÿ’– DESCRIPTION ๐Ÿ’–

We allocate one q_vector. That's it. That's the whole vibe. ๐Ÿ’…

And if that allocation fails? We return -ENOMEM. Not me crying in errno ๐Ÿ˜ญ โ€” that's literally the documented behaviour, so plan for it bestie.

๐Ÿ”ฎ SEE ALSO ๐Ÿ”ฎ

First up, the source, in case you want to read the real thing:

  • Kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c

And now the entire friend group โ€” everyone gets a shoutout, nobody left on read:


okay that's the whole page, go slay ๐Ÿซถโœจ bye bestie, ily, read your errno values ๐Ÿ’–

๐ŸŒŸ little sign-off moment: this came from ./drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun..., dated October 2026, and the page itself is wx_alloc_q_vector(9) โ€” main character of this manual section fr fr ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ‘‘
๐Ÿ“ฆ where this page comes from