write_seqcount_begin(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… write_seqcount_begin(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the kernel API manual β€” this one's a (9) page, and it's about write_seqcount_begin. it lives at ./include/linux and it's dated October 2026, so like… future girl math but make it concurrency πŸ•°οΈβœ¨


🌸 NAME 🌸

write_seqcount_begin β€” start a seqcount_t write side critical section. that's it. that's the whole vibe check. you're opening the writer's door πŸ”‘


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

write_seqcount_begin (s );

literally just hand it s and go, no cap 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • s β€” pointer to a seqcount_t, or honestly any of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t variants πŸ’– (yes queen, the whole little family is welcome)

πŸ¦‹ CONTEXT πŸ¦‹

okay this part is the important part, so like, pay attention bestie πŸ‘€ sequence counter write side sections must be serialized and non-preemptible. that's not a suggestion, that's the law πŸ“œ

preemption gets automatically disabled if and only if the seqcount write serialization lock is associated and preemptible. if and only if!! conditional queen πŸŽ€

and if readers can be invoked from hardirq or softirq context? then interrupts or bottom halves must be respectively disabled. respectively!! keep that straight πŸ’€

don't skip the context rules, i'm literally begging β€” getting this wrong is giving undefined behaviour energy and nobody wants that 😭

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

kernel file ./include/linux/seqlock.h and the whole entire friend group:

like, the whole friend group showed up to the function πŸ’… iconic turnout, honestly 🌈


okay that's the page!! mwah πŸ’‹ this has been write_seqcount_begin(9) from the kernel API manual, sourced from ./include/linux and dated October 2026 β€” go forth and serialize your write side sections, bestie, i believe in you πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from