read_seqcount_latch_retry(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… read_seqcount_latch_retry β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual, and today's main character is read_seqcount_latch_retry(9) β€” the little function that tells you whether your read section needs a do-over. yes, THE vibe check of the latch world. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

read_seqcount_latch_retry β€” end a seqcount_latch_t read section 🫢

like, you opened a read section, you did your lil reading, and now you're closing it out and asking the kernel "was that valid tho?" and it answers you. iconic behaviour honestly.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int read_seqcount_latch_retry (const seqcount_latch_t *s , unsigned start );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • s β€” Pointer to seqcount_latch_t. yes it's a pointer, yes it's const, no you do not get to mess with it πŸ’…
  • start β€” count, from read_seqcount_latch. this is the lil souvenir you grabbed on the way in so you can compare it on the way out. iykyk.

⭐ RETURN ⭐

true if a read section retry is required, else false.

that's it, that's the whole verdict. true = bestie the data moved, run it back 😭. false = you're good, ship it πŸ”₯.


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

so many siblings, it's giving big family energy. the whole squad lives in the Kernel file ./include/linux/seqlock.h, and here's literally every single one of them πŸ‘‘


ngl bestie, this page is tiny but it's doing so much. always check your retry, always respect the sequence count, and never ever pretend a retry wasn't needed. the kernel will notice πŸ™ˆ

πŸ’œ that's the whole page! brought to you straight from ./include/linux, dated October 2026 β€” no cap, that's the source and version, so you know it's legit. mwah, go read your latches responsibly πŸ§šβœ¨πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from