virtqueue_map_need_sync(9)
πΈ NAME πΈ
virtqueue_map_need_sync β check a dma address needs sync π
β¨ This is the virtqueue_map_need_sync(9) page from the Kernel API Manual, bestie.
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
bool virtqueue_map_need_sync (const struct virtqueue *_vq , dma_addr_t addr );
π ARGUMENTS π
_vqβ thestruct virtqueuewe're talking about. That's the one, bestie π«Άaddrβ DMA address. The address in question, periodt π
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
Okay so the whole assignment is a vibe check for one DMA address: check if the dma address mapped by the virtqueue_map_* APIs needs to be synchronized. That's it, no cap β it's giving tiny but important little bool moment.
The return type is bool π (yes, literally return bool, iconic).
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
Kernel file: ./drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c β and here's the whole squad, all linked up:
virtqueue_add_sgs(9)virtqueue_add_outbuf(9)virtqueue_add_outbuf_premapped(9)virtqueue_add_inbuf(9)virtqueue_add_inbuf_cache_clean(9)virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx(9)virtqueue_add_inbuf_premapped(9)virtqueue_dma_dev(9)virtqueue_kick_prepare(9)virtqueue_notify(9)virtqueue_kick(9)virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(9)virtqueue_disable_cb(9)virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(9)virtqueue_poll(9)virtqueue_enable_cb(9)virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(9)virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(9)vring_interrupt(9)virtqueue_resize(9)virtqueue_reset(9)virtqueue_get_vring_size(9)virtqueue_map_alloc_coherent(9)virtqueue_map_free_coherent(9)virtqueue_map_page_attrs(9)virtqueue_unmap_page_attrs(9)virtqueue_map_single_attrs(9)virtqueue_unmap_single_attrs(9)virtqueue_map_mapping_error(9)virtqueue_map_sync_single_range_for_cpu(9)virtqueue_map_sync_single_range_for_device(9)
xoxo π this page's source is ./drivers/virtio, its date is October 2026, and it's the virtqueue_map_need_sync(9) page from the Kernel API Manual β slay, bye π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms