virtqueue_m...ange_for_cpu(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ virtqueue_m...ange_for_cpu(9) β€” bestie edition πŸ¦‹

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual (yes, that manual, the one that lives in the kernel tree) and it's about virtqueue_map_sync_single_range_for_cpu. It's giving "niche virtio lore" and honestly? we're obsessed. Let's get into it πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

virtqueue_map_sync_single_range_for_cpu β€” map sync for cpu 🫢

like, that's literally the whole thing. map. sync. for the cpu. iconic.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void virtqueue_map_sync_single_range_for_cpu (const struct virtqueue
*_vq , dma_addr_t addr , unsigned long offset , size_t size , enum
dma_data_direction dir );

it returns void, so no sneaky return values to check, bestie β€” it just does the thing. ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • _vq β€” the struct virtqueue we're talking about. yes, it literally has an underscore in front. no, we don't know why either. πŸ™ˆ
  • addr β€” DMA address
  • offset β€” DMA address offset
  • size β€” buf size for sync
  • dir β€” DMA direction

five args, all business. slay. πŸ”₯


πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so here's the vibe check πŸ‘‘ β€” before you call this function, you gotta use virtqueue_map_need_sync to confirm that the DMA address really needs to be synchronized. like, check first, sync second. that's the whole rule. do not skip the check, fr fr. 😭

lowkey important: this function assumes you already did the virtqueue_map_need_sync confirm step. it's not out here guessing for you, bestie.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole friend group shows up here, and we are not leaving anyone out 🫢:

that's the whole squad, no cap. and yes, virtqueue_map_need_sync(9) is in there too β€” the one from the DESCRIPTION. told you it was important πŸ’€


and that's the page, bestie! 🧚 this lil masterpiece lives in ./drivers/virtio and it's dated October 2026 β€” so it's from the future, which is very main character energy of it. mwah πŸ’‹ πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from