vidtv_psi_sd...rvice_assign(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… vidtv_psi_sdt_service_assign β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for vidtv_psi_sdt_service_assign(9) β€” yes the header truncates it all cute and dramatic like vidtv_psi_sd...rvice_assign(9), that's just the vibe, we move 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

vidtv_psi_sdt_service_assign β€” Assigns the service loop to the SDT. that's it, that's the whole job, and she does it flawlessly πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void vidtv_psi_sdt_service_assign (struct vidtv_psi_table_sdt *sdt ,
struct vidtv_psi_table_sdt_service *service );

two pointers, one function, zero drama (the good kind of zero drama). slay ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • sdt β€” The SDT to assign to. this is the main character table, she's receiving the goods πŸ‘‘
  • service β€” The service loop (one or more services). could be a whole little squad of services, could be one, either way she's coming along for the ride πŸ¦‹

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the tea, and it's important tea πŸ“

This will free the previous service loop in the table. like, the old one? gone. bye. she's not keeping both, that's not the vibe.

Then β€” and this is the part you need to know β€” this will assign ownership of the service loop to the table. i.e. the table will free this service loop when a call to its destroy function is made. so like, the table is now the responsible one, she's got custody, no cap 😭 and if you go freeing that service loop yourself afterwards? that's a whole mess bestie, don't do it. let the destroy function handle her. periodt πŸ’€


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole friend group, fr fr β€” go read these too, iykyk πŸ’œ


and that's the page!! mwah πŸ’‹ this little number lives at ./drivers/media/test-drivers/v... and she's dated October 2026, filed ever so chicly under vidtv_psi_sd...rvice_assign(9). go assign some services, bestie, you're gonna ate πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from