smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(9) πŸ’…

okay so welcome to the smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(9) page, straight out of the Kernel API Manual β€” section 9, kernel-security girlie territory, and yes she is that girl ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

smack_msg_queue_msgrcv β€” checks whether the target actually has r/w access to the msg_queue, no cap πŸ”₯


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int smack_msg_queue_msgrcv (struct kern_ipc_perm *isp , struct msg_msg
*msg , struct task_struct *target , long type , int mode );

bestie look at that signature. it's giving "five arguments but only two of them matter" energy 😭


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • isp β€” the object 🫢 this one's the real main character.
  • msg β€” unused πŸ™ˆ literally just vibing there, doing nothing.
  • target β€” the task that msgrcvs from the queue πŸ‘‘ this is who we're vibe-checking.
  • type β€” unused πŸ«₯ not invited to the group chat.
  • mode β€” unused πŸ’€ also not invited.

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

Returns 0 if target has read and write access, error code otherwise πŸ’–

that's it. that's the whole personality. a tiny little yes-or-no gatekeeper for the message queue and honestly? iconic.

ngl the description is short, but we respect a function that knows exactly what it is πŸŽ€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

kernel file ./security/smack/smack_lsm.c β€” and here's the entire extended friend group, in order, because we don't do "etc." around here πŸ’…


and that's the whole page, bestie 🫢 mwah β€” this little cutie lives over in ./security/smack, she's dated October 2026, and she answers to the name smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(9). go forth and check your access, periodt πŸ’–βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from