smack_key_permission(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… smack_key_permission β€” Smack access on a key

okay so bestie, welcome to smack_key_permission(9) from the Kernel API Manual ✨ this is the section 9 girlie that answers one very specific question: can this task touch this key? πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

smack_key_permission β€” Smack access on a key πŸ”‘


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int smack_key_permission (key_ref_t key_ref , const struct cred *cred ,
       enum key_need_perm need_perm );

like, that's the whole signature, no cap πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • key_ref β€” gets to the object πŸ‘€ like it's the actual key we're vibe-checking
  • cred β€” the credentials to use πŸͺͺ the identity paperwork we're doing the check with
  • need_perm β€” requested key permission πŸ™ the specific thing being asked for

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

Return 0 if the task has read and write to the object, an error code otherwise. periodt πŸ’€ like that's it, that's the whole function β€” green light 0, or an error code, no in-between bestie 😭


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./security/smack/smack_lsm.c β€” and honestly the whole extended fam shows up here, it's giving reunion episode 🫢


ngl bestie, that SEE ALSO list is a lot β€” but like, every single one of them is here, ate and left no crumbs πŸ‘‘ so go read them all, iykyk πŸ’œ

πŸŽ€ okay that's the whole page!! brought to you by ./security/smack, dated October 2026, and this little smack_key_permission(9) moment is over β€” mwah, go check those key permissions bestie πŸ’…βœ¨πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from