self_check_in_wl_tree(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… self_check_in_wl_tree β€” like, the whole vibe

okay so first things first, bestie: this page lives in the Kernel API Manual, and it's about self_check_in_wl_tree, which is literally just a vibe check for your wear-leveling RB-tree. that's it. that's the function. no cap. 🌸

✨ NAME ✨

self_check_in_wl_tree β€” check that wear-leveling entry is in WL RB-tree.

like, it verifies that a wear-leveling entry is actually sitting in the WL RB-tree where it's supposed to be. simple. iconic. moving on. πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int self_check_in_wl_tree (const struct ubi_device *ubi , struct
ubi_wl_entry *e , struct rb_root *root );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • ubi β€” the UBI device description object. it's giving "who am I and what device am I on" energy.
  • e β€” the wear-leveling entry to check. the main character we're doing a vibe check on, fr fr.
  • root β€” the root of the tree. the tree we're checking e against. keep up bestie 🫢

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so the whole thing is this: this function returns zero if e is in the root RB-tree, and -EINVAL if it is not. that's literally the entire personality. zero = slay, she's in the tree. -EINVAL = not in the tree, and we're telling you about it. 😭✨

ngl bestie, this is a self-check function, so if you're getting -EINVAL in a context where that's not expected, something upstream is lowkey not doing its job. that's all I'm saying. πŸ‘€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

kernel file ./drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c, plus the whole friend group of related functions β€” every single one of these, no skips, bestie:


okay that's the whole page bestie, go forth and let your trees be correct πŸ’–

mwah πŸ’‹ β€” brought to you by the source tree at ./drivers/mtd/ubi, dated October 2026, and the one and only self_check_in_wl_tree(9) πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹β­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from