do_sync_erase(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… do_sync_erase β€” the do_sync_erase(9) page, bestie edition πŸŽ€

okay so you're in the kernel API manual, section 9, and the page is literally called do_sync_erase(9). yes we're doing kernel docs. no i'm not okay about it. let's go ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

do_sync_erase β€” run the erase worker synchronously. like, no waiting around, no "i'll get to it later", we're erasing now, bestie. πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int do_sync_erase (struct ubi_device *ubi , struct ubi_wl_entry *e , int
vol_id , int lnum , int torture );

she returns an int, she takes five things, she's booked and busy. πŸ‘‘


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

every single one of these matters, do not skip, i'm serious:

  • ubi β€” the UBI device description object. it's giving "the whole world this function lives in" energy. 🌈
  • e β€” the WL entry of the physical eraseblock to erase. yes, that PEB. the main character of this call. πŸ”₯
  • vol_id β€” the volume ID that last used this PEB. remembering who had it last, we love continuity. πŸ’œ
  • lnum β€” the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB. keeping receipts, fr fr. πŸ“
  • torture β€” if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured. and yes, it's literally called torture and i'm obsessed with that naming choice. πŸ’€ no cap.
ngl, torture is not a fun little bonus feature β€” it's a real flag with real consequences for that physical eraseblock. treat it with respect. πŸ™ˆ

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the whole squad, alphabetically-adjacent-ish, in one giant group chat. i love a lore dump:

also, Γ  propos of nothing πŸ™ƒ, the kernel file this all lives in is ./drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c β€” that's the spot, that's the source. iykyk. 🌟


and that's the whole page, bestie, you ate that. the source is the kernel file ./drivers/mtd/ubi, dated October 2026 β€” so yeah, future vibes, very main character of it. until next time, mwah πŸ«ΆπŸ’–πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from