security_task_kill(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… security_task_kill(9) β€” signal permission check, bestie πŸ’…

okay so this page is straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and it's all about security_task_kill β€” the function that asks β€œhey, are we actually allowed to send this signal?” πŸ‘‘


✨ NAME ✨

security_task_kill β€” Check if sending a signal is allowed

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int security_task_kill (struct task_struct *p , struct kernel_siginfo
*info , int sig , const struct cred *cred );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • p β€” target process 🎯
  • info β€” signal information
  • sig β€” signal value
  • cred β€” credentials of the signal sender, NULL if current

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so here's the vibe: this function checks permission before sending signal sig to p. πŸ’Œ

info can be NULL, the constant 1, or a pointer to a kernel_siginfo structure. If info is 1 or SI_FROMKERNEL(info) is true, then the signal should be viewed as coming from the kernel and should typically be permitted. 🌈

SIGIO signals are handled separately by the send_sigiotask hook in file_security_ops. iykyk πŸ‘€

⭐ RETURN ⭐

Returns 0 if permission is granted. That's the green light, bestie. βœ…

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

okay the SEE ALSO section is literally a whole group chat. The kernel file is ./security/security.c, and the reference roll call starts with lsm_file_alloc(9), then:

mwah πŸ’‹ β€” sourced from ./security, October 2026, and this page is security_task_kill(9). periodt.

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from