security_fs..._parse_param(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… security_fs_context_parse_param β€” Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, we're deep in kernel land today and this one's honestly kind of a baddie. it's from the Kernel API Manual, and it's all about a filesystem context getting a parameter handed to it. let's get into it πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

security_fs_context_parse_param β€” literally just: configure a filesystem context. that's the whole gig. periodt ✨


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int security_fs_context_parse_param (struct fs_context *fc , struct fs_parameter *param );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • fc β€” the filesystem context, aka the main character of this whole situation 🫢
  • param β€” the filesystem parameter, aka the little message it's carrying πŸ‘‘

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

so the way that this works: userspace handed over a parameter to configure a superblock. and now the LSM is standing there like… do i want this? πŸ‘€

the LSM has two options, no cap:

  • it can consume the parameter (slay, it's hers now), or
  • it can return it to the caller for use somewhere else (respectful handback, we love to see it)

that's it. that's the vibe check. πŸ¦‹


⭐ RETURN ⭐

the return value is honestly giving "read the room":

  • if the parameter is used by the LSM, she should return 0 βœ…
  • if it's returned to the caller, you get -ENOPARAM πŸ™ˆ
  • otherwise? a negative error code comes back at you 😭

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

okay so this is the part where i need you to hydrate before we go any further πŸ’€ there are a LOT of neighbours. every single one, no skips, in order:

bestie if you made it to the end of that list, you're genuinely built different πŸ’€πŸ‘‘ i'm obsessed with you fr fr.

that's the whole page, angel πŸ’œ no cap, every hook accounted for. this icon lives in ./security and the date on it is October 2026 β€” so go be the most secure filesystem context at the function, mwah πŸ“πŸ§šβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from