pcie_relaxe...ring_enabled(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled β€” Kernel API Manual, bestie edition ✨

okay so real talk, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(9). yes that's the whole entire name, it's giving long-distance-relationship-with-a-hyphen energy, don't @ me. (the page header squishes it to pcie_relaxe...ring_enabled(9) but that's just the terminal being dramatic and running out of room πŸŽ€)


✨ NAME ✨

pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled β€” literally just probing to see if PCIe relaxed ordering is enabled, that's it, that's the whole vibe πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled (struct pci_dev *dev );

it returns a bool, she takes one pointer, she minds her own business. iconic behavior honestly πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • dev β€” the PCI device you're querying, like "hey bestie what's ur status" πŸ’–

🧚 DESCRIPTION 🧚

so basically this function returns true if the device has enabled the relaxed ordering attribute. that's the whole plot. no twists, no cliffhanger, just a sweet little yes-or-no, and honestly we respect the transparency 🫢✨

ngl if you're out here expecting extra lore, there isn't any β€” the manpage said what it said, periodt πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the kernel file ./drivers/pci/probe.c is the mothership, and these are all her little friends ok family dinner time πŸ“:

like genuinely go read them all, iykyk πŸ“šπŸ’œ


⭐ the sign-off ⭐

this whole lil page lives in ./drivers/pci, it's dated October 2026, and the versiony source line is the same pcie_relaxe...ring_enabled(9) situation as the header (truncation queen 😭). stay hydrated, read ur manpages, and slay ur kernel debugging fr fr πŸŒˆπŸ’€πŸ”₯

pcie_relaxe...ring_enabled(9) β€” ./drivers/pci β€” October 2026 β€” pcie_relaxe...ring_enabled(9)

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from