libie_ctlq_post_rx_buffs(9)
π libie_ctlq_post_rx_buffs β kernel API manual, but make it make sense π
okay so bestie, gather round, because this one is a little function with a big job and honestly the name is a whole mouthful. It lives in the kernel API manual, section 9, and it's about feeding buffers to a descriptor ring. yes. that. we're doing this. π
β¨ NAME β¨
libie_ctlq_post_rx_buffs β post buffers to descriptor ring π¦
like, you take buffers, and you post them. onto the descriptor ring. that's the whole vibe. slay.
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
int libie_ctlq_post_rx_buffs (struct libie_ctlq_info *ctlq );
one function, one argument, returns an int. simple girlie, no cap. π
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
ctlqβ the control queue that needs its Rx descriptor ring initialized with new Rx buffers. this is the queue, the main character, the one you're restocking. π«Ά
β¨ DESCRIPTION β¨
so here's the thing, and this part is not a vibe, it's a rule: the caller must make sure that calls to libie_ctlq_post_rx_buffs and libie_ctlq_recv for each queue are either serialized or used under ctlq->lock.
like... literally either serialize them or hold the lock. those are the options. don't just vibe in there unlocked, that's not giving what you think it's giving. π the two functions are sharing the same queue and you gotta keep them from stepping on each other's toes β think of it as β¨coordinated chaosβ¨ only, and only if you do it right.
β¨ RETURN β¨
0β on success. we love to see it. π-ENOMEMβ if any buffer could not be allocated. tragic, but at least it tells you. π
β¨ SEE ALSO β¨
the whole friend group showed up for this one, bestie, look at this list:
- Kernel file
./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/libie/controlq.c libie_ctlq_free_fq(9),libie_ctlq_init_fq(9),libie_ctlq_prep_rx_desc(9),libie_ctlq_free_tx_msgs(9),libie_ctlq_alloc_tx_msgs(9),libie_cp_free_desc_mem(9),libie_ctlq_dealloc_ring_res(9),libie_cp_alloc_desc_mem(9),libie_ctlq_alloc_queue_res(9),libie_ctlq_init_regs(9),libie_find_ctlq(9),libie_ctlq_add(9),libie_ctlq_remove(9),libie_ctlq_init(9),libie_ctlq_deinit(9),libie_ctlq_tx_desc_from_msg(9),libie_ctlq_send_desc_avail(9),libie_ctlq_send(9),libie_ctlq_send_clean(9),libie_ctlq_fill_rx_msg(9),libie_ctlq_recv(9),libie_ctlq_xn_pop_free(9),__libie_ctlq_xn_push_free(9),libie_ctlq_xn_push_free(9),libie_ctlq_xn_deinit_dma(9),libie_ctlq_xn_init_dma(9),libie_ctlq_xn_process_recv(9),libie_xn_check_async_timeout(9),libie_ctlq_xn_recv(9),libie_cp_map_dma_mem(9),libie_cp_unmap_dma_mem(9),libie_ctlq_xn_process_send(9),libie_ctlq_xn_send(9),struct libie_ctlq_xn_rel_tx_ctx(9),libie_ctlq_xn_rel_tx_buf(9),libie_ctlq_xn_send_clean(9),libie_ctlq_xn_shutdown(9),libie_ctlq_xn_deinit(9),libie_ctlq_xn_init(9)
reminder bestie: serialize those calls or hold ctlq->lock. that's the whole mood. π₯
kay that's the page!! π source/version line was ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/l... and the date on this one is October 2026, and yes the manpage itself is libie_ctlq_post_rx_buffs(9) from the Kernel API Manual β mwah, go post some buffers responsibly, ily π§π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms