__libie_ctlq_xn_push_free(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ __libie_ctlq_xn_push_free(9) ✨

okay so bestie, this page is straight out of the Kernel API Manual and it's giving "tiny function, big responsibilities" energy πŸŽ€ like it's literally one bool and two pointers but the whole controlq world depends on it, iykyk.


🌸 NAME 🌸

__libie_ctlq_xn_push_free β€” unsafely push an xn entry into the free list πŸ’…

yes bestie the unsafely is right there in the name, that's not me being dramatic, that's the manpage being dramatic. read it and respect it 🫢

πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

bool __libie_ctlq_xn_push_free (struct libie_ctlq_xn_manager *xnm ,
       struct libie_ctlq_xn *xn );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • xnm β€” the Xn transaction manager ✨ like, the boss of the whole xn situation, main character energy fr
  • xn β€” the xn entry to be added into the free list πŸ¦‹ this is the lil guy going home to the free pile

⭐ RETURN ⭐

returns a bool that tells you whether xnm destruction can be triggered by the caller πŸ‘‘ so like. the function hands you back the vibe check on whether you're the one who gets to tear the manager down. no cap, that's important, don't sleep on it πŸ™ˆ


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

the whole friend group πŸ’– starting with the source file itself:


that's the whole squad, go read them too, they ate πŸ’…βœ¨

and that's a wrap bestie πŸ“ this iconic lil page came from ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/l... and it's dated October 2026, so go forth, push your xn entries, and remember: it literally says unsafely in the name 😭πŸ”₯ πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from