i10nm_imc_absent(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… i10nm_imc_absent(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to section 9 of the Kernel API Manual and let me tell you, this little function is a whole vibe check for your memory controller πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

i10nm_imc_absent β€” literally just checks whether the memory controller @imc is absent, that's the whole gig 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool i10nm_imc_absent (struct skx_imc *imc );

yes queen, it returns a bool and takes exactly one pointer, no surprises, no plot twists πŸ’…


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • imc β€” the pointer to the structure of memory controller EDAC device. that's it, that's the whole parameter, she's lowkey carrying the entire function on her shoulders 😭

⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • true if the memory controller EDAC device is absent πŸ’€
  • false otherwise 🌈

like, it's giving "am I even here or not" energy and honestly? iconic.


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

peep the kernel file ./drivers/edac/i10nm_base.c for the whole lore drop, plus these absolute legends:

iykyk 🧚


no cap, this page is coming at you from ./drivers/edac, dated October 2026 β€” that's the source and the date bestie, take a screenshot and slay πŸ’–πŸ”₯πŸ‘‘
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from