dma_fence_is_later_or_same(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

ok so dma_fence_is_later_or_same β€” bestie, this is the little guy that returns true if f1 is later than or the same as f2 🫢 that's literally the whole job.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool dma_fence_is_later_or_same (struct dma_fence *f1 , struct dma_fence
*f2 );

like yes she's a bool-returning icon, no cap πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • f1 β€” the first fence, and she's gotta be from the same context as her bestie over there πŸ’–
  • f2 β€” the second fence, also from the same context, we do not mix friend groups here 🚫

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

So the vibe check is this: it returns true if f1 is chronologically later than f2, or if they're literally the same fence. Same fence? still slay, still true. πŸ’…

⚠️ okay this part matters, do not skip it: both fences must be from the same context, because a seqno is not re-used across contexts. like, the seqnos only make sense inside one context, so comparing across contexts is giving chaos and it's not the move 😭

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Kernel file ./include/linux/dma-fence.h, plus the whole friend group of related pages β€” go say hi πŸ‘‹


and that's the whole page, bestie, you ate that πŸ“

mwah, this one came from the ./include/linux corner of the kernel, dated October 2026, and yes she's filed under dma_fence_is_later_or_same(9) β€” go forth and compare fences responsibly πŸ’œβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from