dma_fence_is_later(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ dma_fence_is_later(9) ✨

okay bestie, we’re in the Kernel API Manual and this one is a tiny little boolean check with main-character energy πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

dma_fence_is_later β€” return if f1 is chronologically later than f2 πŸ•°οΈ


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

the whole signature, untouched, because we do not mess with code:

bool dma_fence_is_later (struct dma_fence *f1 , struct dma_fence *f2 );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • f1 β€” the first fence from the same context πŸ’«
  • f2 β€” the second fence from the same context πŸ’«

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

Returns true if f1 is chronologically later than f2. Both fences must be from the same context, since a seqno is not re-used across contexts. no cap, that same-context detail is literally the whole vibe check πŸ”₯


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

the whole friend group 🫢:


okay that’s the whole page, mwah πŸ’‹ source/version: ./include/linux; date: October 2026; manual page: dma_fence_is_later(9) 🌈

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from