dma_fence_is_later(9)
β¨ dma_fence_is_later(9) β¨
okay bestie, weβre in the Kernel API Manual and this one is a tiny little boolean check with main-character energy π
π NAME π
dma_fence_is_later β return if f1 is chronologically later than f2 π°οΈ
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
the whole signature, untouched, because we do not mess with code:
bool dma_fence_is_later (struct dma_fence *f1 , struct dma_fence *f2 );
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
f1β the first fence from the same context π«f2β the second fence from the same context π«
π DESCRIPTION π
Returns true if f1 is chronologically later than f2. Both fences must be from the same context, since a seqno is not re-used across contexts. no cap, that same-context detail is literally the whole vibe check π₯
π SEE ALSO π
the whole friend group π«Ά:
Kernel file ./include/linux/dma-fence.hstruct dma_fence(9)struct dma_fence_cb(9)struct dma_fence_ops(9)dma_fence_was_initialized(9)dma_fence_put(9)dma_fence_get(9)dma_fence_get_rcu(9)dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(9)dma_fence_spinlock(9)dma_fence_lock_irqsave(9)dma_fence_unlock_irqrestore(9)dma_fence_assert_held(9)Safe external access to driver provided object members(9)dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(9)dma_fence_is_signaled(9)__dma_fence_is_later(9)dma_fence_is_later_or_same(9)dma_fence_later(9)dma_fence_get_status_locked(9)dma_fence_set_error(9)dma_fence_timestamp(9)dma_fence_wait(9)dma_fence_is_array(9)dma_fence_is_chain(9)dma_fence_is_container(9)
okay thatβs the whole page, mwah π source/version: ./include/linux; date: October 2026; manual page: dma_fence_is_later(9) π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms