dce_v8_0_ch...tency_hiding(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dce_v8_0_check_latency_hiding β€” kernel API manual, section 9 πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual (section 9, the kernel-functions girlies) and today's main character is dce_v8_0_check_latency_hiding. no cap, it's a whole vibe.


✨ NAME ✨

dce_v8_0_check_latency_hiding β€” check latency hiding πŸ¦‹

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool dce_v8_0_check_latency_hiding (struct dce8_wm_params *wm );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • wm β€” the watermark calculation data. that's it, that's the whole argument. she's the passport, she's the ~vibes~, she's everything the function needs to do her little check πŸ’–

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so, what does she actually do? she checks latency hiding β€” and before you ask, yes, this is the CIK flavor of that check. (CIK, iykyk. πŸ’…)

she's the one who gets pulled in for display watermark bandwidth calculations β€” that whole pipeline where the display is like "bestie do I have enough bandwidth" and this function is the vibe check that answers.

and her answer is literally just a bool, which is so iconic of her:

  • returns true if the display fits βœ…
  • returns false if it doesn't ❌

that's the entire personality. no side quests, no drama, just a yes or a no and she's out. periodt. πŸ’€

fr fr though β€” true = display fits, false = display does not fit. do not mix these up, bestie, the whole bandwidth calculation is gonna be looking at you funny. 😭

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole group chat, in order, no one gets left on read:

like, that's a lot of bandwidth functions. the bandwidth girlies ate and left no crumbs πŸ”₯


and that's the whole page, bestie, you made it to the end 🫢 this one came straight out of ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, dated October 2026, in the Kernel API Manual β€” mwah, love that for us πŸ’œβœ¨πŸ§š

dce_v8_0_ch...tency_hiding(9) Β· that's a wrap πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from