binder_validate_ptr(9)
π binder_validate_ptr(9) β the Kernel API Manual glow-up β¨
okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual, section 9, and today's main character is binder_validate_ptr(9) π she's a little validation girlie and honestly? she ate.
πΈ NAME πΈ
binder_validate_ptr β validates a binder_buffer_object inside a binder_buffer. that's it, that's the whole vibe π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
struct binder_buffer_object * binder_validate_ptr (struct binder_proc
*proc , struct binder_buffer *b , struct binder_object *object ,
binder_size_t index , binder_size_t start_offset , binder_size_t
*object_offsetp , binder_size_t num_valid );
like yes she takes seven arguments, she's high maintenance, but she's worth it π«Ά
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
procβ thebinder_procthat owns the buffer. the landlord, basically πbβ thebinder_bufferthat's holding the object. the container, the moment, the venue πobjectβ thestruct binder_objectwe're reading into. this is where the tea gets poured πindexβ index into the offset array where thebinder_buffer_objectis chillin' π₯start_offsetβ points to the start of the offset array. the origin story, iykyk βobject_offsetpβ the offset of the object read frombπnum_validβ how many valid offsets live in the offset array. the headcount, no cap π
π RETURN π
okay so here's the tea, bestie, listen up π§
if index is within the valid range of the offset array described by start and num_valid, and there's a valid binder_buffer_object at the offset found in index index of the offset array β then that object gets returned. slay β¨
otherwise? NULL. that's it. she's not mad, she's just done π
BIG CAVEAT, do not skip this β the offset found in indexindexitself is not verified. this function assumes thatnum_validelements fromstartwere previously verified to have valid offsets. so like... if you didn't do your homework earlier, that's on you fr fr π
and if object_offsetp is non-NULL, then the offset within b is written to it π
π SEE ALSO π
Kernel file ./drivers/android/binder.c, plus the whole friend group π
binder_proc_lock(9)binder_proc_unlock(9)binder_inner_proc_lock(9)binder_inner_proc_unlock(9)binder_node_lock(9)binder_node_unlock(9)binder_node_inner_lock(9)binder_node_inner_unlock(9)binder_worklist_empty(9)binder_enqueue_work_ilocked(9)binder_enqueue_deferred_thread_work_ilocked(9)binder_enqueue_thread_work_ilocked(9)binder_enqueue_thread_work(9)binder_dequeue_work(9)binder_select_thread_ilocked(9)binder_wakeup_thread_ilocked(9)binder_inc_node_tmpref(9)binder_dec_node_tmpref(9)binder_get_ref_for_node_olocked(9)binder_inc_ref_olocked(9)binder_dec_ref_olocked(9)binder_get_node_from_ref(9)binder_free_ref(9)binder_update_ref_for_handle(9)binder_dec_ref_for_handle(9)binder_inc_ref_for_node(9)binder_thread_dec_tmpref(9)binder_proc_dec_tmpref(9)binder_get_txn_from(9)binder_get_txn_from_and_acq_inner(9)binder_free_txn_fixups(9)binder_cleanup_transaction(9)binder_get_object(9)binder_validate_fixup(9)struct binder_task_work_cb(9)binder_do_fd_close(9)binder_deferred_fd_close(9)struct binder_ptr_fixup(9)struct binder_sg_copy(9)binder_do_deferred_txn_copies(9)binder_cleanup_deferred_txn_lists(9)binder_defer_copy(9)binder_add_fixup(9)binder_can_update_transaction(9)binder_find_outdated_transaction_ilocked(9)binder_proc_transaction(9)binder_get_node_refs_for_txn(9)binder_netlink_report(9)binder_free_buf(9)binder_apply_fd_fixups(9)print_next_binder_node_ilocked(9)
and that's the whole page, bestie, no notes π this icon lives in ./drivers/android, dated October 2026, and she'll always answer to binder_validate_ptr(9) π¦β¨ go forth and validate those pointers, periodt π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms