binder_find_...tion_ilocked(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… binder_find_...tion_ilocked(9) πŸ’…

okay so first things first, bestie β€” this page lives in the Kernel API Manual, and the function name is literally binder_find_...tion_ilocked(9), ellipsis and all. No, we're not fixing it. We respect the truncation. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

binder_find_outdated_transaction_ilocked β€” find the outdated transaction πŸ‘‘


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

struct binder_transaction * binder_find_outdated_transaction_ilocked
(struct binder_transaction *t , struct list_head *target_list );

that's the whole signature, no cap. returns a pointer to struct binder_transaction, and the _ilocked suffix is your little hint that locks are involved (more on that in DESCRIPTION, don't skip ahead πŸ™ˆ).


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • t β€” the new async transaction. this is the fresh one you're bringing to the party.
  • target_list β€” the list you're gonna dig through to find the outdated transaction. it's a struct list_head *, bestie, act like you know.

⭐ RETURN ⭐

you get back the outdated transaction if found, and NULL if no outdated transacton can be found β€” and yes, the original spells it "transacton" there, we're preserving the lore πŸ’€. so lowkey: check for NULL, always, that's your vibe check.


πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

Requires the proc->inner_lock to be held.

that's it. that's the whole requirement. no cap, it's giving "short but if you ignore it you WILL have a bad time". hold the proc->inner_lock before you call this, fr fr β€” the _ilocked in the name is not decorative, it's a promise you have to keep 🫢.


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/android/binder.c β€” that's the main character here πŸ‘‘ β€” plus this whole extended friend group:

like, that's the whole group chat, go read them too πŸ’–


and that's the page!! πŸŽ€ sourced from ./drivers/android, dated October 2026, and it's literally titled binder_find_...tion_ilocked(9) β€” iconic, we stan a truncated header, periodt πŸ¦‹βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from