amdgpu_fence...rupt_restore(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… amdgpu_fence...rupt_restore(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes, the actual one, and yes we're about to read a manpage together like it's the group chat gossip of the week 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

amdgpu_fence_need_ring_interrupt_restore β€” a lil helper function whose whole entire job is to check whether fence driver interrupts need to be restored. that's it. that's the gig πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool amdgpu_fence_need_ring_interrupt_restore (struct amdgpu_ring *ring
);

literally one function, one argument, returns a bool. she's lowkey minimal and I respect it πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • ring β€” the ring that to be checked, iykyk. that's the one you're handing over, bestie 🌈

⭐ DESCRIPTION ⭐

so here's the tea β˜• β€” interrupts for rings that belong to GFX IP don't need to be restored when the target power state is s0ix. not me learning power states at 2am 😭

and then the actual answer: return true if you need to restore interrupts, false otherwise. simple, clean, iconic πŸ‘‘


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole friend group showed up fr fr, no cap:


ok and one tiny heads up before you go β€” this page lives under ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, dated October 2026, and it's filed as amdgpu_fence...rupt_restore(9). that's the source/version and date bestie, saving you the scroll πŸ’œ

anyway mwah, go restore those interrupts (or don't, depending on what s0ix says) πŸ§šπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from