ad_marker_response_received(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

ad_marker_response_received(9) πŸ’…

okay so this page is from the Kernel API Manual, and today’s main character is ad_marker_response_received(9). kernel networking bestie, we are so in it 🫢

NAME πŸ’–

ad_marker_response_received β€” handle receive of a marker response frame. that’s the whole assignment, bestie πŸŽ€

SYNOPSIS 🌸

void ad_marker_response_received (struct bond_marker *marker , struct
       port *port );

the vibe check: it returns void, and it takes a struct bond_marker *marker plus a struct port *port. yes the spacing is exactly what the page says, don’t come for me πŸ’€

ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • marker β€” marker PDU received. that’s the PDU that arrived, bestie πŸ’Œ
  • port β€” the port we're looking at. the one under our little microscope πŸ”

DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so here’s the tea: this function does nothing. not a single thing. zero. zilch. πŸ™ˆ

Why? because we decided not to implement send and handle response for marker PDU's, in this stage, but only to respond to marker information. so it is intentionally empty at this point, and that is the whole lore. periodt πŸ’…

SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

okay bestie, if you want the full 3ad cinematic universe, start with the kernel file and then go absolutely feral on these cross-references. all the icons are here 🌈


mwah πŸ’‹ this cutie comes from the ./drivers/net/bonding source tree, dated October 2026, and it’s filed under ad_marker_response_received(9). slay πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from