__port_move...tached_state(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 __port_move_to_attached_state β€” NAME energy 🌸

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ and today's main character is __port_move_to_attached_state β€” the little function whose whole job is to check if a port should transition back to attached state πŸ’… that's it. that's the lore. no cap.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool __port_move_to_attached_state (struct port *port );

it's giving very short, very iconic, very bool πŸŽ€ β€” like she returns a boolean and she doesn't elaborate further. queen behavior honestly.


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • port β€” the port we're looking at πŸ‘€ literally the port in question, that's the whole vibe. this is the thing you're asking about when you ask "should this one go back to attached state?"

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

okay so the Kernel file ./drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c is where all her friends live, and bestie there are so many of them β€” like a whole group chat. here's the entire roster, no skips, no cuts 🫑:

that's fifty-seven cross-references bestie, i counted, and every single one of them ate πŸ’…βœ¨


ngl if you're reading this instead of the source you're already doing great, keep going πŸ¦‹

and that's the whole page!! brought to you by the fine people over in ./drivers/net/bonding 🌈 from October 2026, per the __port_move...tached_state(9) footer herself β€” mwah, ily, go read the other fifty-seven pages now πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from