_base_allocate_reply_pool(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… _base_allocate_reply_pool(9) β€” Kernel API Manual, but make it cute πŸ’…

Okay so bestie, this is the Kernel API Manual page for _base_allocate_reply_pool(9), and it is exactly what it says on the tin: allocating DMA'able memory for the reply pool. No cap, that's the whole main-character job. ✨

🌸 NAME 🌸

_base_allocate_reply_pool β€” allocating DMA'able memory for the reply pool. That's it, that's the vibe. πŸ’–

πŸ› οΈ SYNOPSIS πŸ› οΈ

The signature is literally giving:

int _base_allocate_reply_pool (struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc , u32 sz );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • ioc β€” the adapter object, aka the little main character this whole thing hangs around. 🫢
  • sz β€” the DMA Pool size. Yes, that sz. Keep it cute and keep it exact. πŸŽ€

πŸ’– RETURN πŸ’–

Returns 0 for success and non-zero for failure. That's the vibe check: 0 slays, non-zero is a no. 😭✨

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file: ./drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c

And now the whole extended friend group, because apparently we are doing the entire (9) cinematic universe, no skipping, periodt:


Cute little sign-off time: this page is from ./drivers/scsi/mpt3sas, October 2026 edition, and the page header is _base_allocate_reply_pool(9) β€” bye bestie, stay DMA'able πŸ’…βœ¨πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from