XE_REG_INITIALIZER(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… XE_REG_INITIALIZER(9) β€” like, the kernel API manual bestie ✨

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual and it's all about XE_REG_INITIALIZER, which is genuinely the moment you need when you're stuck initializing a xe_reg_t in a place where you literally cannot do the fun stuff. no cap, it's niche but it's iconic πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

XE_REG_INITIALIZER β€” the initializer for xe_reg_t. that's it, that's the whole vibe. πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

XE_REG_INITIALIZER (r_ , ... );

look at her go πŸ¦‹


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • r_ β€” the register offset. this one is the whole point, bestie, it's mandatory πŸ‘‘
  • ... β€” additional options, like access mode and whatever else. peek at struct xe_reg for the available options, iykyk πŸ”₯

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so here's the tea: the register field is mandatory, and then any additional options get passed along as arguments after it. simple, slay 🌈

usually you'd reach for XE_REG instead, because it creates an object of the right type β€” that's the main character energy move and generally what you should prefer. ✨

but β€” and this is the plot twist 😭 β€” when you're initializing static const storage, where a compound statement is not allowed, you can use this instead. it's giving "the backup plan that eats every time" πŸ“

lowkey important: the compound-statement restriction is the whole reason this exists, so don't come for XE_REG's gig unless you're literally in that static const situation πŸ’€

🫢 SEE ALSO 🫢

go read all of them, fr fr, they're all connected and it's a whole lore drop πŸ§šπŸ’œ


⭐ this little masterpiece lives over in ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs and it's dated October 2026 β€” mwah, take care of her, bye bestie! πŸ™ˆπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from