XE_REG_INITIALIZER(9)
π XE_REG_INITIALIZER(9) β like, the kernel API manual bestie β¨
okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual and it's all about XE_REG_INITIALIZER, which is genuinely the moment you need when you're stuck initializing a xe_reg_t in a place where you literally cannot do the fun stuff. no cap, it's niche but it's iconic π
πΈ NAME πΈ
XE_REG_INITIALIZER β the initializer for xe_reg_t. that's it, that's the whole vibe. π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
XE_REG_INITIALIZER (r_ , ... );
look at her go π¦
π ARGUMENTS π
r_β the register offset. this one is the whole point, bestie, it's mandatory π...β additional options, like access mode and whatever else. peek atstruct xe_regfor the available options, iykyk π₯
π DESCRIPTION π
so here's the tea: the register field is mandatory, and then any additional options get passed along as arguments after it. simple, slay π
usually you'd reach for XE_REG instead, because it creates an object of the right type β that's the main character energy move and generally what you should prefer. β¨
but β and this is the plot twist π β when you're initializing static const storage, where a compound statement is not allowed, you can use this instead. it's giving "the backup plan that eats every time" π
lowkey important: the compound-statement restriction is the whole reason this exists, so don't come for XE_REG's gig unless you're literally in that static const situation π
π«Ά SEE ALSO π«Ά
- Kernel file
./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_reg_defs.h XE_REG_ADDR_MAX(9)struct xe_reg(9)struct xe_reg_mcr(9)XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED(9)XE_REG_OPTION_VF(9)XE_REG(9)XE_REG_MCR(9)
go read all of them, fr fr, they're all connected and it's a whole lore drop π§π
β this little masterpiece lives over in ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs and it's dated October 2026 β mwah, take care of her, bye bestie! ππ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms