PROL(5)
πΈ NAME πΈ
prol β define the rules for symbolic to real layout translation
Bestie, this is PROL(5) from RDS FILE FORMATS β part 1 of 3, and it's literally the blueprint for how symbolic layout becomes real layout. π
π¦ ORIGIN π¦
This software belongs to the ALLIANCE CAD SYSTEM, developed by the ASIM team at LIP6 laboratory of UniversitΓ© Pierre et Marie CURIE, in Paris, France. β¨
- Web:
http://asim.lip6.fr/recherche/alliance/ - E-mail:
alliance-users@asim.lip6.fr
π DESCRIPTION π
This file describes the rules used by the mbk(1) to rds translator. In the following file, symbolic layout objects are referred to as mbk(1) objects β mbk(1) being the internal data structure that supports symbolic representation. On the other hand, rds is a data structure describing mainly rectangles, so it's the one used for real layout representation. π
A few syntaxic remarques on the way to write the file, because yes:
- The case of identifiers is not significant, so
NDIFis equivalent toNdiF. - Comments are allowed anywhere in the file, using the sharp (
#) as start of comment, and newline as end of comment. - A line beginning with a sharp will be ignored.
- A line containing a sharp will be read up to the character preceding it.
- A newline can be escaped using the backslash (
\) followed by the newline. - If some character β spaces or tabs for example β follow the backslash, chances are that a syntax error will be issued. π
First, some important process parameters are needed: the physical grid step, that is the least common multiple of all the technologies values in terms of layout distances, and the lambda, computed from a careful observation of the process design rules. Then a set of tables is needed, to describe how to translate a symbolic object, belonging to the mbk(1) world, and a set of layout rectangles, in rds.
Each table has a special meaning, and its parametrization exend being not full, some borders are to be evocated. Several type of table exists indeed:
- Some are needed for object translation.
- Others for post treatment parametrization.
- Others to define
ciforgdsidentifiers regardingrdsones.
Many things seem to be parametrizable, but in fact, mostly, if not only, numbers, names in cif and gds translation tables, and boolean value in post treatement may be changed without problems. π«Ά
For any table, if some layer is not applicable, it can simply be omitted. The default action is do nothing, or use a value of 0.0 for all entries. Periodt. β¨
π LAYERS AND PATTERNS π
Since the goal of this file is to allow translation from mbk(1) to rds, the meaning of the layers in both representation shall be known. π
π Mbk layers π
NWELLβ minimum width4; N-well.PWELLβ minimum width4; P-well.NTIEβ minimum width2; N diffusion for polarisation.PTIEβ minimum width2; P diffusion for polarisation.NDIFβ minimum width2; N diffusion for transistor.PDIFβ minimum width2; P diffusion for transistor.NTRANSβ minimum width1(gate width) ; N transistor.PTRANSβ minimum width1(gate width) ; P transistor.POLYβ minimum width1; polysilicon, not transistor gate.ALU1β minimum width1; first level of metal.ALU2β minimum width2; second level of metal.ALU3β minimum width3; third level of metal (unused).TPOLYβ minimum width1; through route forPOLY.TALU1β minimum width1; through route forALU1.TALU2β minimum width2; through route forALU2.TALU3β minimum width3; through route forALU3(unused).
π¦ Mbk patterns π¦
CONT_POLYβ cut pattern fromALU1toPOLY.CONT_VIAβ cut pattern fromALU1toALU2.CONT_VIA2β cut pattern fromALU2toALU3.CONT_DIF_Nβ cut pattern fromALU1toNDIF.CONT_DIF_Pβ cut pattern fromALU1toPDIF.CONT_BODY_Nβ cut pattern fromALU1toNTIE.CONT_BODY_Pβ cut pattern fromALU1toPTIE.C_X_Nβ corner primitive for L or S shaped N transistor.C_X_Pβ corner primitive for L or S shaped P transistor.
π Rds layers π
RDS_NWELLβ N-well (or N-tub), bulk for P transistors.RDS_PWELLβ P-well (or P-tub), bulk for N transistors.RDS_NDIFβ use for symbolic extractor as equivalent ofNDIF.RDS_PDIFβ use for symbolic extractor as equivalent ofPDIF.RDS_NTIEβ use for symbolic extractor as equivalent ofNTIE.RDS_PTIEβ use for symbolic extractor as equivalent ofPTIE.RDS_POLYβ polysillicon run, for cell internal wirering.RDS_GATEβ transistor polysillicon, for gate.RDS_TPOLYβ polysillicon feed through. Indicate to a router that a track is free of polysillicon.RDS_CONTβ hole in the isolating layer between polysillicon or active area and first metal level.RDS_ALU1β first metal level run.RDS_TALU1β first metal level feed through. Indicates to a router that a track is free of first metal level.RDS_VIA1β hole in the isolating layer between first metal level and second metal level.RDS_ALU2β second metal level run.RDS_TALU2β second metal level feed through. Indicate to a router that a track is free of second metal level.RDS_VIA2β hole in the isolating layer between second metal level and third metal level.RDS_ALU3β third metal level run.RDS_TALU3β third metal level feed through. Indicate to a router that a track is free of third metal level.RDS_ALU4β fourth metal. (Used only for GaAs designs.)RDS_VIA3β hole in the isolating layer between third metal level and fourth metal level. (Used only for GaAs designs.)RDS_ACTIVβ active area dropped in N or P implant to build transistors.RDS_NIMPβ implant area, (sometime known as N select), for N transistors.RDS_PIMPβ implant area, (sometime known as P select), for P transistors.RDS_CPASβ passivation, used in pads.RDS_USER0β user defined purpose layer. (May be used for DRC logical operations.)RDS_USER1β user defined purpose layer. (May be used for DRC logical operations.)RDS_USER2β user defined purpose layer. (May be used for DRC logical operations.)RDS_REFβ virtual layer for the representation of symbolic references.RDS_ABOXβ virtual layer needed to indicate the abutment box of a model.RDS_DEFAULTβ default layer, shall never appear anywhere.
π οΈ FILE DESCRIPTION π οΈ
The following lines describe the file, entry by entry, specifying what is expected. π
π Physical grid
DEFINE PHYSICAL_GRID .5
This statement defines the minimum grid spacing enforced by the foundry. Slay.
π Lambda
DEFINE LAMBDA 1
This defines the value of the lambda in microns. This value, like any other one in the rest of the file, must be a multiple of the PHYSICAL_GRID. No cap.
π Segment translation table
TABLE MBK_TO_RDS_SEGMENT
This table contains all the information needed to translate a symbolic segment of a given layer onto one, two or three real rectangles of specified layers. An example of this table is given below, with values needed for a technology where one lambda is equal to 1.05 and the design grid is set to 0.15 microns. β¨
TABLE MBK_TO_RDS_SEGMENT
NWELL RDS_NWELL VW 3.15 6.30 0.0 ALL
NDIF RDS_ACTIV VW 0.60 -0.90 0.0 ALL \
RDS_NIMP VW 2.10 2.10 0.0 ALL
PDIF RDS_ACTIV VW 0.60 -0.90 0.0 ALL \
RDS_PIMP VW 2.10 2.10 0.0 ALL
NTIE RDS_ACTIV VW 0.60 -0.90 0.0 ALL \
RDS_NIMP VW 1.20 0.30 0.0 ALL
PTIE RDS_ACTIV VW 0.60 -0.90 0.0 ALL \
RDS_PIMP VW 1.20 0.30 0.0 ALL
NTRANS RDS_GATE VW 0.00 0.15 0.0 ALL \
RDS_ACTIV VW -1.50 4.35 0.0 ALL \
RDS_NIMP VW 0.00 7.35 0.0 ALL
PTRANS RDS_GATE VW 0.00 0.15 0.0 ALL \
RDS_ACTIV VW -1.50 4.35 0.0 ALL \
RDS_PIMP VW 0.00 7.35 0.0 ALL
POLY RDS_POLY VW 0.60 0.15 0.0 ALL
ALU1 RDS_ALU1 VW 0.90 0.75 0.0 ALL
ALU2 RDS_ALU2 VW 0.90 -0.30 0.0 ALL
TPOLY RDS_TPOLY VW 0.60 0.15 0.0 ALL
TALU1 RDS_TALU1 VW 0.90 0.75 0.0 ALL
TALU2 RDS_TALU2 VW 0.90 -0.30 0.0 ALL
END
The first column is the mbk(1) layer name to be translated, then there are one or more groups of 6 columns each. For each physical rectangle, there are 3 parameters :
- rds layer name
- One of
VW,LCW,RCWthat indicates thetypeof segment to be generated - physical length extension:
DLR - physical width oversize:
DWR - offset from symbolic axis:
OFFSET - tools for which the generated rectangle is applicable:
ALL,DRC(for the symbolic design rule checker, seedruc(1)),EXT(for the symbolic extractor, seelynx(1))
These parameters are meant regarding the symbolic segment.
π Connectors translation table
Okay bestie, this is the connector cheat sheet: TABLE MBK_TO_RDS_CONNECTOR. It contains all the information needed to translate a symbolic connector of a given layer onto one single real rectangle. The example below uses the values needed for a technology where one lambda is equal to 1.05 and the design grid is set to 0.15 micron. Slay.
TABLE MBK_TO_RDS_CONNECTOR
POLY RDS_POLY 0.6 0.15
ALU1 RDS_ALU1 0.9 0.75
ALU2 RDS_ALU2 0.9 -0.3
END
One symbolic connector gets translated into one physical rectangle using 3 parameters:
- the rds layer name
- the physical width oversize:
DWR - the physical extension on each side of the abutment box:
DER
It is discouraged to use active or well layers as connectors while designing. Like, just don't, bestie.
π§ Vias translation table
TABLE MBK_TO_RDS_VIA β this table has all the info needed to translate a symbolic via of a given layer onto one to four real rectangles of user specified layers. The example values below are for a technology where one lambda is equal to 1.05 and the design grid is set to 0.15 micron.
TABLE MBK_TO_RDS_VIA
CONT_BODY_N RDS_ALU1 3 RDS_CONT 1.5 RDS_ACTIV 3.3 RDS_NIMP 4.5
CONT_BODY_P RDS_ALU1 3 RDS_CONT 1.5 RDS_ACTIV 3.3 RDS_PIMP 4.5
CONT_DIF_N RDS_ALU1 3 RDS_CONT 1.5 RDS_ACTIV 3.3 RDS_NIMP 6.3
CONT_DIF_P RDS_ALU1 3 RDS_CONT 1.5 RDS_ACTIV 3.3 RDS_PIMP 6.3
CONT_POLY RDS_ALU1 3 RDS_CONT 1.5 RDS_POLY 3
CONT_VIA RDS_ALU1 3 RDS_VIA1 1.5 RDS_ALU2 3
CONT_VIA2
C_X_N RDS_GATE 1.2 RDS_ACTIV 5.4 RDS_NIMP 8.4
C_X_P RDS_GATE 1.2 RDS_ACTIV 5.4 RDS_PIMP 8.4
END
This table describes how to translate one symbolic via to 2, 3 or 4 physical rectangles. It's defined like this: the first column is the mbk(1) via name to translate, then there are 4 groups of 2 columns each, which correspond to four potential target rds rectangles of user specified layer. In one group, the first column is the rds layer name, and the second one is the rds layer width. The rectangle is centered on the contact coordinates, and expands in the four direction of half the given width value. iykyk π
π Denotching values table
TABLE S2R_OVERSIZE_DENOTCH β this table contains the oversize value needed to erase notches. All the rectangles of the same rds layer are oversized by this value and then merged altogether and undersized by the same value. Example below, bestie.
TABLE S2R_OVERSIZE_DENOTCH
RDS_NWELL 3.00
RDS_POLY 0.75
RDS_GATE 0.75
RDS_ALU1 0.75
RDS_ALU2 0.75
RDS_ACTIV 1.05
RDS_NIMP 2.55
RDS_PIMP 2.55
END
For some rds layers, like RDS_NWELL, RDS_NIMP and RDS_PIMP, two rectangles distant from less or equal the minimum spacing design rule must be merged in a single one. In this case, the oversize value is equal to the minimum spacing rule between two edges of the same layer divided by 2.
Some other rds layers, like RDS_ALU1, ..., must not be merged. In this case, the oversize value is equal to the minimum spacing rule between two edges of the same layer divided by 2, minus the physical grid.
Some layers never create notch, such as RDS_VIA1 or RDS_CONT, so the oversize value is null. no notes, no notches β¨
πΈ Ring width β TABLE S2R_BLOC_RING_WIDTH
s2r must merge segments to erase notches even if those segments are in two different hierarchical level blocs, for example, two blocs abutted side to side. So it must be able to fetch segments inside blocs. It is not needed to flatten the entire bloc β only a ring is necessary. The ring is computed from the abutment box edges or from the envelop edges of the overlapping blocs. Example incoming:
TABLE S2R_BLOC_RING_WIDTH
RDS_NWELL 6
RDS_POLY 1.8
RDS_GATE 1.8
RDS_ALU1 1.8
RDS_ALU2 1.8
RDS_ACTIV 2.4
RDS_NIMP 1.8
RDS_PIMP 1.8
END
The normal ring width is the minimum spacing design rule between two segments of the same rds layer. A zero means that no ring is wanted for that rds layer. Periodt.
π Minimum real layer width design rule β TABLE S2R_MINIMUM_LAYER_WIDTH
This table contains the minimum width of each rds layer. It is used by s2r to avoid creating rectangles below the minimum required, during the merge operation. respect the minimums, bestie π«Ά
TABLE S2R_MINIMUM_LAYER_WIDTH
RDS_NWELL 6
RDS_POLY 1.2
RDS_GATE 1.2
RDS_ALU1 1.8
RDS_ALU2 1.8
RDS_ACTIV 1.2
RDS_NIMP 2.7
RDS_PIMP 2.7
END
A zero can be specified when it is sure that this layer is not to be merged, because not treated by s2r.
π
Post treatment configuration table β TABLE S2R_POST_TREAT
This table tells s2r which rds layers must be post-processed. Precisely: if a layer is only to be translated, or translated and then post-processed. Translated means translate and fit from symbolic to real, and post-treated means it should also be merged with its neighbours. For example, it's not necessary to merge cut layers such as RDS_CONT. It's giving selective treatment, honestly.
TABLE S2R_POST_TREAT
RDS_NWELL TREAT NULL
RDS_PWELL NOTREAT NULL
RDS_NDIF NOTREAT NULL
RDS_PDIF NOTREAT NULL
RDS_NTIE NOTREAT NULL
RDS_PTIE NOTREAT NULL
RDS_POLY TREAT NULL
RDS_GATE TREAT NULL
RDS_TPOLY NOTREAT NULL
RDS_CONT NOTREAT NULL
RDS_ALU1 TREAT NULL
RDS_TALU1 NOTREAT NULL
RDS_VIA1 NOTREAT NULL
RDS_ALU2 TREAT NULL
RDS_TALU2 NOTREAT NULL
RDS_VIA2 NOTREAT NULL
RDS_ALU3 NOTREAT NULL
RDS_TALU3 NOTREAT NULL
RDS_ACTIV TREAT NULL
RDS_NIMP TREAT RDS_PIMP
RDS_PIMP TREAT RDS_NIMP
RDS_REF NOTREAT NULL
RDS_ABOX NOTREAT NULL
END
If set to NOTREAT, the first parameter indicates a translation. If set to TREAT, then the layer is translated and then post-treated.
To post-process creates problems with the implantation layers. It is possible to have a good symbolic layout (no symbolic design rule errors), and have a resulting layout with DRC violations, created by a poor post-processing. It is due to the fact that these layers do not exist in symbolic, so it is not possible to apply them drc verifications. If two rectangles of these layers are too close (less than a given value), they must be merged. Generally, there is no problem, but when corners are too near it is impossible to merge with the classical algorithm, expand, merge, then shrink. Rectangles, known as scotches, are created to merge anyway, like this:
+--------+ +--------+ +-----+--+
|////////| |////////| |/////|//|
|//+--+//| |//+--+//| |//+--|//|
|//| |//| gives -> |//| |//| or -> |//| |//|
|//+--+//| +-----------+ |//+--|//|
|////////| |///////////| |/////|//|
+--------+ +--------+//| +-----|//|
^ +--------+ |//|-----+ |//+--------+
| |////////| |//|/////| |///////////|
o--->|//+--+//| |//|--+//| +-----------+
| |//| |//| |//| |//| |//| |//|
implant |//+--+//| |//|--+//| |//|--+//|
areas |////////| |//|/////| |//|/////|
+--------+ +--+-----+ +--+-----+
An N implantation layer should not overlap a P implantation one. We say that P implantations and N implantations are complementary. A scotch will not be created if it intersects with any of the rectangles of the complementary layers.
If a record contains in the second field a rds layer different from NULL, it indicates the complementary layer. This implies that if it is a layer that might need scotches, the algorithm will try not to intersect with it when creating scotches. smart, honestly π§
πΈοΈ Extraction graph table β TABLE LYNX_GRAPH
This table gives the connexion graph between the rds layers. For each layer, the list of the connectable layers is written. Up to now, the extractor works only on translated symbolic layout.
TABLE LYNX_GRAPH
β¦and that table wraps up right here, bestie. The last chunk of it is verbatim below β same spacing, same line breaks, and yes it really does end with END:
RDS_NDIF RDS_CONT RDS_NDIF
RDS_PDIF RDS_CONT RDS_PDIF
RDS_NTIE RDS_CONT RDS_NTIE
RDS_PTIE RDS_CONT RDS_PTIE
RDS_POLY RDS_CONT RDS_GATE RDS_POLY
RDS_GATE RDS_POLY RDS_GATE
RDS_CONT RDS_PDIF RDS_NDIF RDS_POLY RDS_PTIE RDS_NTIE RDS_ALU1 RDS_CONT
RDS_ALU1 RDS_CONT RDS_VIA1 RDS_ALU1 RDS_REF
RDS_REF RDS_CONT RDS_VIA1 RDS_ALU1 RDS_REF
RDS_VIA1 RDS_ALU1 RDS_ALU2 RDS_VIA1
RDS_ALU2 RDS_VIA1 RDS_VIA2 RDS_ALU2
RDS_VIA2 RDS_ALU2 RDS_ALU3 RDS_VIA2
RDS_ALU3 RDS_VIA2 RDS_ALU3
END
Do not touch the whitespace, periodt. Those END lines are the vibe-check that closes a table, and if you yeet one out the parser is gonna have a whole crisis. π
β¨ Extraction capacitance table π
TABLE LYNX_CAPA β this one's giving budget spreadsheet for your layers.
So this table gives the capacitance in picofarad per square lambda of each layer. That's the whole assignment. Lowkey straightforward!
But bestie, read the small print because it's kind of a big deal:
- The extractor computes only substrat capacitances.
- The capacitances associated with gate or drain or sources are not computed.
- On the other hand, the transistor sizes (area, perimeter) are computed.
And why, you ask? (This is to ensure compatibility with Spice). That's it, that's the reason, and honestly? Iconic of them for telling us. π«Ά
Here's what the table actually looks like:
TABLE LYNX_CAPA
RDS_POLY 1.00e-04
RDS_ALU1 0.50e-04
RDS_ALU2 0.25e-04
END
Three layers, three numbers, zero notes. Copy them exactly β scientific notation and all. π₯
πΈ Cif translation table π
TABLE CIF_LAYER β the "who are you on the cif side" table.
This table gives the equivalence between internal layers and their representation in the cif file format. In other words, your internal layer name walks in, and it walks out wearing a cif name. Glow-up, honestly. β¨
A table may look like that (for MOSIS layers):
TABLE CIF_LAYER
RDS_NWELL CWN
RDS_PWELL CWP
RDS_ACTIV CAA
RDS_NIMP CSN
RDS_PIMP CSP
RDS_POLY CPG
RDS_GATE CPG
RDS_CONT CCA
RDS_ALU1 CMF
RDS_VIA1 CVA
RDS_ALU2 CMS
END
Quick eyeball: RDS_POLY and RDS_GATE both map to CPG β same cif layer, two internal names, and that's so valid of them. No drama, no cap. π¦
β Gds translation table π
TABLE GDS_LAYER β the cif section's louder, number-having sibling.
This table gives the equivalence between internal layers and their representation in the gds file. Same energy as the cif one, except the other side is a number instead of a name. A table may look like that (for CMP layers):
TABLE GDS_LAYER
RDS_NWELL 1
RDS_POLY 11
RDS_GATE 11
RDS_CONT 16
RDS_ALU1 17
RDS_VIA1 18
RDS_ALU2 19
RDS_ACTIV 2
RDS_NIMP 12
RDS_PIMP 14
RDS_CPAS 20
END
Heads up, bestie: these are not in numerical order β 1, 11, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, then back to 2, 12, 14, 20. That's just how the example is written, so don't go "fixing" the sort order, ok? π Also RDS_POLY and RDS_GATE are matching again at 11. Consistency queen behavior. π
π SEE ALSO π
- Insights on the symbolic to real translation process are available in the file
mapping.ps.
Go read it. It's giving "the lore you need before the finale." π§
π BUG REPORT π
- This tool is under development at the ASIM department of the LIP6 laboratory.
- We need your feedback to improve documentation and tools.
Yes, you. Your feedback. They're literally asking for it β this whole thing is a work in progress and it gets better when people say stuff. So if something's weird, say something. π«Ά
Okay that's the whole page, bestie β you made it to the end! π This little beauty is brought to you by ASIM/LIP6, and the version you're reading is dated October 1, 1997, filed under PROL(5). Old? Sure. Still slaying? Absolutely. π
β¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixos 26.05: alliance 5.1.1-unstable-2025-02-24
- nixpkgs unstable: alliance 5.1.1-unstable-2025-02-24
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms