zynqmp_is_valid_clock(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– zynqmp_is_valid_clock(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, welcome to zynqmp_is_valid_clock(9) β€” that's the page name and the function name, we love a multitasker ✨ this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's literally here to answer one question: is this clock valid or not?? πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ


✨ NAME ✨

zynqmp_is_valid_clock β€” check whether clock is valid or not πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

int zynqmp_is_valid_clock (u32 clk_id );

that's it. that's the whole vibe check. one argument, one int coming back at you 🫢


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • clk_id β€” the clock index, aka the little number that tells you which clock we're interrogating πŸ”

⭐ RETURN ⭐

so here's the tea, and it's giving three-possible-outcomes energy:

  • returns 1 if the clock is valid βœ…
  • returns 0 if the clock is invalid ❌
  • otherwise you get an error code 😭 (yes, "else" β€” that's the original wording and we're not about to improvise, fr fr)

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

the whole clique, no cap β€” they all hang out in the kernel file ./drivers/clk/zynqmp/clkc.c:

like, the entire friend group showed up to the function πŸ’€πŸ‘‘


k bye bestie, go validate some clocks πŸ’œ

this iconic little page comes to you from ./drivers/clk/zynqmp, dated October 2026 (future queen behavior honestly πŸ•°οΈπŸ‘‘) β€” mwah, see you in the next man page πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from