zynqmp_gpd_i..._wakeup_path(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– zynqmp_gpd_is_active_wakeup_path(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, so this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's literally called zynqmp_gpd_is_active_wakeup_path β€” yes, the header up top squishes it down to zynqmp_gpd_i..._wakeup_path(9) because even manpage typesetting has a size limit, but we know her full name πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

zynqmp_gpd_is_active_wakeup_path β€” the little detective that checks if a device is in the wakeup source path πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int zynqmp_gpd_is_active_wakeup_path (struct device *dev , void *not_used );

like, that's the whole signature, no cap 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • dev β€” the device we're checking for the wakeup source path πŸ¦‹
  • not_used β€” a data member that is not required β€” she's just there, existing, iconic, doing nothing πŸ’€

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so what she does is: she checks the device's child hierarchy and checks if any device in there is set as wakeup source ✨ that's it, that's the vibe check 🌈


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • 1 if the device is in the wakeup source path
  • 0 otherwise

fr fr, that's the whole scale β€” binary, no in-between πŸ™ˆ


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚


go read the whole squad if you wanna actually understand the pm-domain situation, bestie β€” this one's just the wakeup-path girlie of the group πŸ’…

and that's a wrap, babe πŸŽ€ this page came from ./drivers/pmdomain/xilinx, dated October 2026, and the manual header still says zynqmp_gpd_i..._wakeup_path(9) β€” she's giving truncated but still stunning ✨ love that for her, mwah πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from