zfcp_qdio_fill_next(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ zfcp_qdio_fill_next ✨

okay bestie, welcome to the kernel API manual πŸ’… this one lives at zfcp_qdio_fill_next(9) and it's a tiny little function with a very specific job. Let's get into it 🫢

🌸 NAME 🌸

zfcp_qdio_fill_next β€” fill the next sbale, but like… only for single sbal requests. that's the whole vibe. ✨

πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void zfcp_qdio_fill_next (struct zfcp_qdio *qdio , struct zfcp_qdio_req
*q_req , void *data , u32 len );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • qdio β€” pointer to struct zfcp_qdio. yes. the whole qdio situation. πŸ‘‘
  • q_req β€” pointer to struct zfcp_queue_req. the request bestie in question 🫢
  • data β€” pointer to data. that's the payload, the stuff, the actual content πŸ’–
  • len β€” length of data. how much of it there is, in numbers πŸ”’

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so here's the lore: this is only required for single sbal requests. that's it. that's the use case. 🎯

and listen β€” calling it when you're wrapping around to the next sbal is a bug. not a quirky little oopsie, an actual bug. so don't do that, bestie 😭 fr fr it's giving "undefined behaviour energy" and we are NOT here for it πŸ’€

🚨 vibe check / warning: single sbal requests only. wrap-around calls = bug. periodt.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.h and its whole friend group β€” go read them, they're iconic:


that's the whole page, bestie β€” no notes, ate and left no crumbs πŸ“

sign-off: this lil beauty comes from ./drivers/s390/scsi and it's dated October 2026. screenshot it, memorise it, tell your friends πŸ’…πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from