zfcp_fsf_exc...rt_data_sync(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

okay bestie, this is the Kernel API Manual page for zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_sync(9) β€” and yes, the header up top is serving the truncated zfcp_fsf_exc...rt_data_sync(9) realness 🫢.

The NAME line is literally zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_sync - Request information about local port. β€” iconic, honestly ✨.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_sync (struct zfcp_qdio *qdio , struct
       fsf_qtcb_bottom_port *data );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • qdio β€” pointer to the QDIO-Queue to use for sending the command. That's the queue bestie, the whole transport vibe. πŸ’…
  • data β€” pointer to the QTCB-Bottom for storing the result of the command, might be NULL. Yes, it can be NULL β€” no pressure 🫢.

🌸 RETURN 🌸

  • 0 β€” Exchange Port Data was successful, data is complete. slay, full data, no crumbs ✨
  • -EIO β€” Exchange Port Data was not successful, data is invalid. oop, invalid data, we don't love that 😭
  • -EAGAIN β€” data contains incomplete data. half-finished data is giving unfinished homework tbh πŸ’€
  • -ENOMEM β€” Some memory allocation failed along the way. memory said "not today" πŸ™ˆ
  • -EOPNOTSUPP β€” This operation is not supported. not supported, not the vibe, moving on πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹


that's the whole page, bestie πŸ’– β€” source/version: ./drivers/s390/scsi, date: October 2026, and the footer still says zfcp_fsf_exc...rt_data_sync(9). byeee, mwah πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from