xt_write_recseq_begin(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xt_write_recseq_begin(9) πŸ’…

okay so this one's from the Kernel API Manual and honestly? she's a little gatekeeper and she knows it. bestie, buckle up πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

xt_write_recseq_begin β€” start of a write section. literally the opening number of the whole write-section era. no cap πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

unsigned int xt_write_recseq_begin (void );

like… that's it. that's the whole vibe check on the signature. iconique πŸ¦‹


🧚 ARGUMENTS 🧚

  • void β€” no arguments. zero. nada. she takes nothing from you, she simply arrives ✨ (ngl a little main character energy of her)

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

Begin packet processing : all readers must wait the end πŸ‘€

like fr fr, the moment you call this, the packet-processing section has officially begun, and every single reader out there has to wait for the end. no sneaking a peek early, we don't do that here πŸ’…

there are two things you gotta have sorted before you even think about calling her, and they're numbered, so you know it's serious:

  1. Must be called with preemption disabled β€” yes, disabled, like actually off. do not skip this, i'm begging 😭
  2. softirqs must be disabled too (or we should use this_cpu_add) β€” so either they're already off, or you go the this_cpu_add route. pick one, bestie 🫢
⚠️ okay this is the part where i hold your hand: these two preconditions are not suggestions, they're requirements. get them wrong and things get real cursed real fast πŸ’€

⭐ RETURN ⭐

here's the tea, and she's a tiny bit cryptic on purpose:

  • 1 β€” if no recursion on this cpu 🌈 (slay, we're clean)
  • 0 β€” if recursion detected πŸ™ˆ (not slay, go fix that)

so like… check the return value, please. i'm asking nicely πŸ’œ


πŸ“ SEE ALSO πŸ“

okay these are all the linked besties, and there are a lot of them, so let's go:

  • Kernel file ./include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h β€” the source file, the origin story, the blueprint πŸ“œ
  • struct xt_action_param(9)
  • struct xt_mtchk_param(9)
  • struct xt_mtdtor_param(9)
  • struct xt_tgchk_param(9)
  • var xt_recseq(9)
  • xt_write_recseq_end(9) β€” okay she's the end, the natural sequel, the closing number πŸ”₯

and that's the whole page, bestie 🧡✨ sending you off with the most important lore of all: this one lives in ./include/linux/netfilter, the manual version is dated October 2026 (yes, future queen behavior 🌸), and the whole thing is filed under xt_write_recseq_begin(9) in the Kernel API Manual β€” periodt, go read xt_write_recseq_end(9) next, love u, bye πŸŽ€πŸ’–πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from