xt_check_proc_name(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ xt_check_proc_name(9) ✨

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one's a little function with a big job πŸ’…


🌸 NAME 🌸

xt_check_proc_name β€” literally just here to check that name is suitable for /proc file creation 🫢


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

int xt_check_proc_name (const char *name , unsigned int size );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • name β€” the file name candidate, like the lil' name your file wants to have πŸ₯Ί
  • size β€” length of buffer, aka how much room we're working with πŸ“

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so some x_tables modules are out here wishing to create a file in /proc, right? and this function is the vibe check for that 🌈 it makes sure the name is actually suitable for this purpose β€” it checks that name is NUL terminated βœ… and that it isn't a 'special' name, like ".." πŸ’€ (yes, the classic chaos pick, we are NOT letting that through).

returns a negative number on error, or 0 if name is useable πŸ‘‘

fr fr, negative = not it, 0 = slay, it's useable πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./net/netfilter/x_tables.c plus the whole friend group: xt_check_entry_offsets(9), xt_alloc_entry_offsets(9), xt_find_jump_offset(9), xt_copy_counters(9), xt_unregister_table_pre_exit(9), xt_unregister_table_exit(9), xt_hook_ops_alloc(9), xt_percpu_counter_alloc(9) 🧚


okay that's the whole page bestie, no gatekeeping πŸ’œ this one's living in ./net/netfilter and it's dated October 2026 β€” iconic of it, honestly. go forth and validate your proc names 😭🌸

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from