xilinx_pl_dm...t_irq_domain(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_init_irq_domain(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ β€” yes this is literally a kernel API manual page and yes the title got cut off in the header, it's giving "my name is too long for the terminal" energy 😭 the full thing, the whole entire icon, is xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_init_irq_domain(9) and we're gonna talk about her.


🌸 NAME 🌸

xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_init_irq_domain β€” Initialize IRQ domain πŸŽ€ that's it, that's the whole job. she inits the IRQ domain. periodt.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_init_irq_domain (struct pl_dma_pcie *port );

so she takes one (1) argument, she's a struct pl_dma_pcie *, her name is port, and she hands you back an int. no cap, that's the whole signature πŸ’… copy it exactly, don't be cute with it.


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • port β€” PCIe port information 🫢 that's your whole PCIe port situation right there, packaged up in a struct, being handed over so she knows which port we're talking about.

πŸ’€ RETURN πŸ’€

okay so. the original page has this heading and then… nothing. absolutely nothing. silence. crickets. πŸ¦— not a single return value documented. so ngl, we're not gonna invent one β€” if the manpage isn't saying, I'm not saying either. main character behavior honestly πŸ™ˆ


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

  • the kernel file ./drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-dma-pl.c πŸ‘‘ (go read the source bestie, it's all in there)
  • struct xilinx_pl_dma_variant(9) 🌈
  • struct pl_dma_pcie(9) ⭐

🌸 cute lil sign-off 🌸

and that's the page!! πŸŽ€ it lives over in ./drivers/pci/controller, dated October 2026, and the whole thing answers to the name xilinx_pl_dm...t_irq_domain(9) (abbreviated, because apparently even the manual can't handle the full name πŸ’€). go forth and init those IRQ domains, iykyk πŸ¦‹πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from