xgpio_irq_ack(9)
π xgpio_irq_ack β Kernel API Manual, bestie edition π
okay so welcome to the xgpio_irq_ack(9) page, part of the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? This one's a short one. A little baby function. But she's got lore, so buckle up. β¨
πΈ NAME πΈ
xgpio_irq_ack β the function whose whole job is to acknowledge a child GPIO interrupt. That's it. That's the assignment. She shows up, she acks, she leaves. π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
void xgpio_irq_ack (struct irq_data *irq_data );
Like, look at her. One parameter. void return. Zero drama. Iconic behavior honestly. π«Ά
β ARGUMENTS β
irq_dataβ the per IRQ and chip data that gets passed down to chip functions. and here's the thing, bestie, and I need you to hear me: this currently does nothing. Like, literally nothing. zero. BUT β and this is the important part βirq_ackis unconditionally called byhandle_edge_irq, so it must be defined. So she exists. She has to exist. She's a required vibe, even if she's not doing anything in this moment. main character energy with no lines, ykwim? π
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
Kernel file ./drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c plus the whole friend group:
struct xgpio_instance(9)xgpio_get(9)xgpio_set(9)xgpio_set_multiple(9)xgpio_dir_in(9)xgpio_dir_out(9)xgpio_save_regs(9)xgpio_remove(9)xgpio_irq_mask(9)xgpio_irq_unmask(9)xgpio_set_irq_type(9)xgpio_irqhandler(9)xgpio_probe(9)
go read them all, they're literally all connected, it's giving family tree π
ngl the whole takeaway here is: this function does nothing right now, but if you don't define it, handle_edge_irq will call it anyway because it's unconditional, so don't get cute and delete her. π
okay that's the whole page!! written under ./drivers/gpio, dated October 2026, and that's the xgpio_irq_ack(9) moment. slay, stay hydrated, and go ack those interrupts bestie πβ¨ππ¦
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms