xfs_btree_agblock_verify(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xfs_btree_agblock_verify(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ β€” we're talking about xfs_btree_agblock_verify(9) today and honestly? she's a vibe checker. a literal vibe checker. πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

xfs_btree_agblock_verify β€” verify a short-format btree block πŸ¦‹

like, she looks at a short-format btree block and goes "hmm, is this actually valid or are you lying to me" and ngl that's iconic of her πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

xfs_failaddr_t xfs_btree_agblock_verify (struct xfs_buf *bp , unsigned
int max_recs );

that's the whole thing. that's the call. no cap. 🫢


🧚 ARGUMENTS 🧚

  • bp β€” the buffer that's holding the btree block, aka the little container where the block in question is just chilling πŸ“
  • max_recs β€” the maximum number of records this btree node is allowed to have, like the guest list limit at the club and she WILL be checking it πŸ’€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

  • Kernel file ./fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c β€” the source, the lore, the origin story πŸ‘‘
  • xfs_btree_agblock_v5hdr_verify(9) β€” her sibling, her other half, the v5 header verify bestie 🌈

lowkey a reminder that xfs_btree_agblock_verify returns an xfs_failaddr_t, so keep that in mind when you're out here calling her, bestie πŸ’–

and that's the tea β˜• β€” this page came to you from ./fs/xfs/libxfs, dated October 2026, and yes the title on the little footer line is still xfs_btree_agblock_verify(9) because she never changes, she's consistent, she's main character energy fr fr πŸŒŸπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from