xfer_get_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ xfer_get_init(9) β€” the kernel API manual page, bestie edition ✨

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, section 9, and it's literally about xfer_get_init β€” the girlies who allocate and initialise one message for transmit. it's giving "setup era" πŸ’…


🌸 NAME 🌸

xfer_get_init β€” allocate and initialise one message for transmit 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int xfer_get_init (const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph , u8 msg_id ,
size_t tx_size , size_t rx_size , struct scmi_xfer **p );

no cap, that's the whole signature. take it in πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • ph β€” pointer to the SCMI protocol handle 🫢
  • msg_id β€” the message identifier, iykyk
  • tx_size β€” transmit message size πŸ“€
  • rx_size β€” receive message size πŸ“₯
  • p β€” pointer to the allocated and initialised message; this is where the magic lands πŸ‘‘

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what does she actually do. she allocates the message using scmi_xfer_get, and then she initialises the header. that's the whole vibe. literally it's a one-two punch: grab the message, set up the header, slay πŸ’…


πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

0 if all went fine, with p pointing to the message. otherwise, you get the corresponding error 😭 (not every story has a happy ending, bestie).


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the full friend group, no one left out fr fr. kernel file ./drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c plus:

like I said β€” the whole group chat πŸ’œ


don't skip the cross-refs, bestie, they're there for a reason 🧚

and that's the page!! source is ./drivers/firmware/arm_scmi, dated October 2026, and it's xfer_get_init(9) in case you forgot already πŸ™ˆ mwah, study safe, go read your kernel source πŸ’‹πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from