xe_vm_has_valid_gpu_mapping(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xe_vm_has_valid_gpu_mapping(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual glow-up ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to section 9 of the Kernel API Manual, and today's main character is xe_vm_has_valid_gpu_mapping β€” an advisory helper that checks whether a VMA or an SVM range has a valid GPU mapping 🫢


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

xe_vm_has_valid_gpu_mapping (tile , tile_present , tile_invalidated );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • tile β€” the tile that the GPU mapping belongs to 🧚
  • tile_present β€” the tile present mask ✨
  • tile_invalidated β€” the tile invalidated mask πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

ok so here's the tea β˜• β€” those READ_ONCEs are literally in a committed relationship with the WRITE_ONCEs, okay? They pair up with the ones in either the TLB invalidation paths (xe_vm.c, xe_svm.c) or the binding paths (xe_pt.c). periodt. πŸ’–

but β€” and this is the important part, ngl, do not skip this β€” they are not reliable without the notifier lock in userptr or SVM cases 🫠 and they're also not reliable without the BO dma-resv lock in the BO case. like, genuinely not reliable. no cap.

so because of that whole situation, they should only be used in opportunistic cases β€” for example skipping a page fault fix, or not skipping a TLB invalidation β€” where it is harmless πŸ™ˆ. lowkey that's the whole vibe: harmless little peek, not a source of truth. iykyk πŸ’€


πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

True if there are valid GPU pages πŸ’š, False otherwise πŸ’”.


⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h β€” and then the whole friend group, fr fr:


πŸ“ reminder bestie: opportunistic only. these reads are giving "vibes check", not "source of truth" β€” if you need real reliability, get the right lock first πŸ’œ

xoxo, this page lives in ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dropped October 2026, and it's literally signed xe_vm_has_valid_gpu_mapping(9) β€” slay πŸŽ€πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from