xe_tlb_inval_job_put(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xe_tlb_inval_job_put(9) β€” the kernel API manual, bestie edition

okay so you're in the kernel API manual section 9, and today's main character is xe_tlb_inval_job_put. she lives in the xe DRM driver and honestly? she's a small function with big "i just handle the refcount" energy. let's get into it 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

xe_tlb_inval_job_put β€” put a reference to a TLB invalidation job. that's it, that's the whole vibe. literally just dropping a ref πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void xe_tlb_inval_job_put (struct xe_tlb_inval_job *job );

returns nothing (void), takes one pointer, slays quietly ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • job β€” the TLB invalidation job object. that's your girl. the thing you're putting a reference to πŸ¦‹

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so here's the tea, bestie: this function decrements the TLB invalidation job's reference count. that's the whole job (pun intended lmao) πŸ”₯

and when that reference count hits 0? it calls xe_tlb_inval_job_destroy. like, she saw the count drop to zero and immediately knew what to do. iconic behavior tbh πŸ‘‘

but wait, there's a little guard clause lore πŸ™ˆ β€” it skips the decrement if the input job is NULL or is IS_ERR. so if somebody hands you a null pointer or an error pointer, you just... don't. no decrementing, no drama, we move on πŸ’€

ngl this is the "check your input before you touch the refcount" moment and honestly more code should do this

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚


πŸ’€ friendly reminder: put and get are a matched set, bestie. don't be out here putting refs you never got. that's giving undefined behavior and we don't do that here

okay that's the whole page!! this one came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dated October 2026, and the manual is the Kernel API Manual, section 9, title xe_tlb_inval_job_put. periodt πŸ’…πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from